The SE Texas Record Jun. 19, 2015, 3:54pm


By JOHN SUAYAN

MARSHALL DIVISION

June 15

Remote Light Intellectual Property, LLC v. Evoqua Water Technologies, LLC 2:15-cv-01036-JRG-RSP

Remote Light Intellectual Property, LLC v. Aquafine Corporation et al 2:15-cv-01042-JRG-RSP

Remote Light Intellectual Property, LLC v. Xylem, Inc. 2:15-cv-01043-JRG-RSP 2:15-cv-01043-JRG-RSP

Austin-based Remote Light Intellectual Property, LLC is the plaintiff.

At issue of the litigation is United States Patent No. 6,403,030 (“the ’030 Patent”) titled “Ultraviolet Wastewater Disinfection System and Method.”

The Dallas law firm Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC is representing Remote Light Intellectual Property.

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. Our Alchemy, LLC, f/k/a Millennium Entertainment, LLC, f/k/a First Look Studios 2:15-cv-01037-JRG

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. ARC Entertainment, LLC 2:15-cv-01038-JRG

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. FUNimation Productions, LTD 2:15-cv-01039-JRG

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. Southport Music Box Corporation d/b/a Music Box Films 2:15-cv-01040-JRG

InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC v. Shout! Factory, LLC 2:15-cv-01041-JRG

Plaintiff InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,526,219 (the “‘219 Patent”) entitled “PictureBased Video Indexing System”, and United States Patent No. 8,150,239, also entitled “PictureBased Video Indexing System”

The plaintiff is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in and to the Patents-in-Suit and possesses all rights of recovery under the Patents-in-Suit.

Attorney William Ellsworth Davis, III of The Davis Firm, PC in Longview is representing InMotion Imagery Technologies.

June 16

Fellowship Filtering Technologies, LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 2:15-cv-01045-JRG

Plaintiff Fellowship Filtering Technologies, LLC complains of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,884,282 (“the ‘282 patent”).

Attorney Elizabeth L DeRieux of the law firm Capshaw DeRieux LLP in Gladewater.

SHERMAN DIVISION

Creswell Holdings LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. 4:15-cv-00407-ALM

Creswell Holdings LLC is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,340,803 (the “’803 Patent”) entitled “Computer Keyswitch.”

The ’803 Patent issued on January 22, 2002. Tung Hsueh Li is listed as the inventor on the ’803 Patent.

The plaintiff is also the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,194,677 (the “’677 Patent”) entitled “Structure of Keyswitch.”

The ’677 Patent issued on February 27, 2001. Tung is listed as the inventor on the ‘677 Patent.

The Dallas law firm Ni, Wang & Massand is representing the plaintiff.

MARSHALL DIVISION

June 17

Numic Technology, LLC v. Nikon Inc. 2:15-cv-01046-JRG-RSP

Numic Technology, LLC is the owner by assignment of the valid and enforceable United States Patent No. 5,969,698 (“the ‘698 Patent”) entitled “Manually Controllable Cursor and Control Panel in a Virtual Image”.

The ‘698 Patent issued on October 19, 1999.

Attorney Ronald William Burns, Jr. of Frisco is representing Numic Technology.

June 18

Gene Reader LLC v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2:15-cv-01049-JRG

Gene Reader LLC v. Tecan U.S., Inc. 2:15-cv-01050

Gene Reader is the plaintiff.

It is the assignee and owner of the right, title and interest in and to United States Patent No. 6,545,758 (the "'758 patent"), entitled "Microarray Detector And Synthesizer" and United States Patent No. 6,567,163 (the "'163 patent"), entitled "Microarray Detector And Synthesizer".

The plaintiff is represented by attorneys Richard C. Weinblatt of the law firm Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC in Wilmington, Del., and Andrew W. Spangler of the law firm Spangler Law P.C. in Longview.

Microstrategy Incorporated v. Apttus Corporation 2:15-cv-01051-JRG-RSP

Microstrategy Incorporated claims infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,154,766 (“the ’766 Patent”) and 6,772,137 (“the ’137 Patent”).

The ‘766 Patent, entitled “System and Method for Automatic Transmission of Personalized

OLAP Report Output”, was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 28, 2000. The ‘137 Patent, entitled “Centralized Maintenance and Management of Objects in a Reporting System”, was issued on August 3, 2004.

Attorney Thomas Bernard Walsh, IV of the law firm Fish and Richardson PC in Dallas is representing the plaintiff.

TYLER DIVISION

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Milestone AV Technologies, LLC d/b/a Chief Manufacturing et al 6:15-cv-00570

Mass Engineered Design is the plaintiff seeking to stop infringement of United States Patent Nos. RE36,978 (the “‘978 Patent”) and 8,102,331 (the “’331 Patent”).

It is represented by attorneys Andrews J. Spangler, John J. Edmonds, Shea Neal Palavan, and Stephen F. Schlather.

More News