Tyler Division

Aug. 1

  • Advanced Display Technologies of Texas LLC v. Dell Inc. et al.

    Plaintiff Advanced Display Technologies is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are Dell Inc., Futurewei Technologies Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA), HTC Corp., Lenovo Inc., Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corp., Sanyo North America Corp., Sony Corporation of America, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,739,931 issued April 14, 1998, for Illumination System Employing an Array of Microprisms and U.S. Patent No. 6,261,664 issued July 17, 2001, for Optical Structures for Diffusing Light.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, court costs, attorney's fees and interest.

    Advanced Display Technologies is represented by Gregory S. Dovel and Julien Adams of Dovel & Luner of Santa Monica, Calif.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00391

  • Remote Vehicle Technologies LLC v. Hyundai Motor America Inc.

    Remote Vehicle Technologies is a Texas limited liability company with a principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. No. 7,084,735 issued Aug. 1, 2006, for Remote Vehicle Security System.

    Remote Vehicle is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction preventing the defendant from further infringement and for an award of damages, costs, expenses, interest and attorney's fees.

    The plaintiffs are represented by Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler Law P.C. in Longview and Marc A. Fenster and Andrew D. Weiss of Russ August & Kabat of Los Angeles, Calif.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00392

  • SFA Systems v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
  • SFA Systems v. Barnes & Noble Inc. et al
  • SFA Systems v. BigMachines Inc. et al.

    SFA is a Texas Limited Liability Company with its principal place in Marshall.

    The defendants are Amazon.com Inc., Buy.com Inc., DSW Inc., Dollar Tree Stores Inc., Meijer Inc., New York & Company, Rite Aid Corp., Symantec, Target Corp., Tigerdirect Inc., Zappos.com Inc., Barnes & Noble Inc., Barnesandnoble.com, Gander Mountain Co., Overton's, Newegg Inc., Newegg.com, Inc. BigMachines Inc., Enterasys Networks Inc., Ricoh Americas Corp. and CareStream Health Inc.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,941,341 issued May 10, 2011, for Sales Force Automation System and Method.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for a permanent injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, restitution of the benefits the defendants earned through infringement, interest, attorney's fees and court costs.

    SFA is represented by Marc A. Fenster, Alexander Giza, Adam Hoffman, Stanley H. Thompson Jr., Jules L. Kabat and Benjamin T. Wang of Russ, August & Kabat in Los Angeles, Calif., and Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler Law in Longview.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case Nos. 6:11-cv-00398; 6:11-cv-00399; 6:11-cv-00400

    Aug. 2

  • Wellogix Technology Licensing v. Automatic Data Processing Inc. et al

    Wellogix is a limited liability corporation with its principal place of business in Houston.

    The defendants are Automatic Data Processing Inc., Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., Hunt Oil Co., Noble Energy Inc., Sandridge Energy Inc., Southwestern Energy Production Co. and XTO Energy Inc.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,991,680 issued Aug. 2, 2011, for Method and Process For Providing Relevant Data, Comparing Proposal Alternatives, and Reconciling Proposals, Invoices and Purchase Orders With Actual Costs in a Workflow Process.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, interest, costs and attorney's fees.

    Wellogix Technology is represented by George Chandler of Chandler Law Offices of Lufkin and Orion Armon and James Brogan of Cooley LLP in Broomfield, Colo.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00401

  • More News