"Where are you going?" "What will you be doing?" "Who's going to be there with you?"
Those are questions all good parents ask of their children, but the answers are not always satisfactory.
"Nowhere." "Nothing." "Nobody."
Parents like transparency. When children are secretive or evasive, parents have reason to worry. Reluctance to reveal their destinations, their activities and their companions leads parents to believe that their offspring may be hiding something.
Citizens like transparency, too, and become indignant when public servants try to avoid proper scrutiny. If they don't have anything to hide, we wonder, then why are they acting like they do?
Transparency should be a desirable quality for administrators of asbestos trusts, as well. Again, if there is nothing to hide, why act suspiciously?
Asbestos trust funds were established so that future claimants can receive benefits from asbestos manufacturers going bankrupt. But the lack of transparency can facilitate fraud, and cause claimants and attorneys to seek redundant restitution from multiple funds.
As U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith (TX-21) has observed, the federal Bankruptcy Code favors transparency in bankruptcy cases, but "this principle of openness is no longer being fully implemented" for asbestos trusts.
Two years ago, Smith asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate the asbestos trusts and raise the veil of secrecy. In a report released last October, the GAO acknowledged that the lack of transparency could facilitate fraud, but concluded that none was occurring. The veil of secrecy was not raised.
Whether there is or isn't fraud, the fact remains that there could be and that just isn't right.
Fortunately, legislation has been introduced in Congress to reduce the potential for fraud. House Resolution 4369 would require bankruptcy trusts to disclose claims and exposure allegations and submit to third-party discovery in civil lawsuits.
Opponents say there's no need for the bill, but you have to wonder why they favor secrecy. If there's nothing to hide, why keep hiding it?
- Connecticut man alleges Texas real estate broker withheld payments
- Worker alleges Armada Towing did not pay overtime
- Texas AG reaches $470M joint state-federal settlement with HSBC
- Shopper blames Target after slipping in store
- Worker blames Westmoreland Builders for two weeks spent in coma
- Texas wrecker service alleges Metro Tow Truck guilty of fraud
- Oilfield workers allege BTI Services, Warrior Energy failed to pay overtime
- Paralegal argues Eberstein & Witherite should pay overtime
- Dallas gentlemen's club accuses N.Y. establishment with similar name of trademark infringement
- Trial lawyer ad spending topples Super Bowl advertisers