TYLER DIVISION

Presqriber LLC v Amazing Charts LLC Case No. 6:14-cv-00439

Presqriber LLC v AO Capital Partners LLC dba Prognosis Innovation Healthcare Case No. 6:14-cv-00440

Presqriber LLC v Aprima Medical Software Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00444-1

Presqriber LLC v Athenahealth Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00442

Presqriber LLC v Cerner Corp. Case No. 6:14-cv-00443

Presqriber LLC v Community Computer Service Inc. dba Mednet Case No. 6:14-cv-00444

Presqriber LLC v Computer Programs and Systems Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00445

Presqriber LLC v CureMD.com Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00446

Presqriber LLC v E-MDs Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00448

Presqriber LLC v eCaresoft Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00447

Presqriber LLC v General Electric Co. Case No. 6:14-cv-00449

Presqriber LLC v Greenway Medical Technologies Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00450

Presqriber LLC v Health Care Systems Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00451

Presqriber LLC v Healthland Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00452

Presqriber LLC v McKesson Corp. Case No. 6:14-cv-00453

Presqriber LLC v Medhost Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00454

Presqriber LLC v Medical Information Technology Inc. dba Meditech Case No. 6:14-cv-00455

Presqriber LLC v Medsphere Systems Corp. Case No. 6:14-cv-00456

Presqriber LLC v Merge Healthcare Solutions Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00457

Presqriber LLC v Nextgen Healthcare Information Systems LLC Case No. 6:14-cv-00458

Presqriber LLC v Optum Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00459

Presqriber LLC v Practice Fusion Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00460

Presqriber LLC v QuadraMed Corp. Case No. 6:14-cv-00461

Presqriber LLC v Quest Diagnostics Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00462

Presqriber LLC v Razor Insights LLC Case No. 6:14-cv-00463

Presqriber LLC v Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00464

Plaintiff Presqriber is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of office in Tyler.

U.S. Patent No. 5,758,095 for an Interactive Medication Ordering System.

Defendants have infringed the ‘095 Patent by making, using or selling electronic health record systems that have achieved ONC-ATCB Certification for Ambulatory and Inpatient medical practices.

According to the complaints, the ‘095 Patent is a “prominent, pioneering patent in the medical systems field, and has been forward-cited in more than 200 subsequently issued U.S. Patents to date and continues to be forward-cited to this day.”

Presqriber is seeking injunctive relief, compensatory damages, enhanced damages, interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and other relief to which it may be entitled. A jury trial is requested.

Craig Tadlock, John J. Harvey Jr. and Keith Smiley of Tadlock Law Firm PLLC in Plano are representing the plaintiff.

 

May 7

Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Ltd. v Google Inc., Gearbox Software LLC and Bonus XP Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00435

Plaintiff Smartflash LLC is a Texas limited liability company with a place of business in Plano. Plaintiff Smartflash Technologies Ltd. is a limited company organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands with a principal place of business on the Island of Tortola.

Defendants are accused of infringing the following patents-in-suit:

U.S. Patent No. 7,334,720 issued Feb. 26, 2008, for Data Storage and Access Systems;

U.S. Patent No. 7,942,317 issued May 17, 2011, for Data Storage and Access Systems;

U.S. Patent No. 8,033,458 issued Oct. 11, 2011, for Data Storage and Access Systems;

U.S. Patent No. 8,061,598 issued Nov. 22, 2011, for Data Storage and Access Systems;

U.S. Patent No. 8,118,221 issued Feb. 21, 2012, for Data Storage and Access Systems; and

U.S. Patent No. 8,336,772 issued Dec. 25, 2012, for Data Storage and Access Systems.

Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Ltd. own all rights and interest to the patents-in-suit, according to the complaint. The patents-in-suit generally cover devices, methods and systems for transmitting, retrieving, downloading, storing and accessing content, content information, DRM data, payment data and supplementary data.

Defendant Google has committed acts of infringement with any version of its Google Play Store, including Play Music, Play Movies, Play TV, Play Books, Play Games, Play Apps and Play Newstand, the suit alleges. Defendant Gearbox Software has committed acts of infringement with its Borderworlds app that runs on Google devices and defendant Bonus XP infringes through its Monster Crew app, according to the plaintiff.

Smartflash is seeking a permanent injunction against defendants, compensatory and supplemental damages, attorneys’ fees, costs, interest, enhanced damages for willful infringement and other just and proper relief. A jury trial is requested.

The plaintiffs are being represented by Bradley Caldwell, Jason Cassady, John Austin Curry and others from Caldwell Cassady & Curry PC in Dallas, and T. John Ward and T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview.

The case has been assigned to District Judge K. Nicole Mitchell.

 

May 6

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Ableton Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00416

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Acronis Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00417

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Altova Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00418

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v ArcSoft Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00415

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Cambium Learning Group Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00419

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Canon USA Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00420

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Chief Architect Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00421

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Code 42 Software Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00422

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Edgewater Marine Industries LLC Case No. 6:14-cv-00423

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Embarcardero Technologies Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00424

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Encore Software Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00425

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Juniper Networks Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00426

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Kofax Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00427

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Native Instruments North America Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00428

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v Perfect World Entertainment Case No. 6:14-cv-00429

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v TLM Inc. Case No. 6:14-cv-00430

Plaintiff Uniloc USA Inc. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Tyler. Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. is a Luxembourg public limited liability company with its principal place of business in Luxembourg.

According to court documents, Uniloc has researched, developed, manufactured and licensed information security technology solutions, platforms and frameworks and owns and has been awarded a number of patents.

Its technology is used in several markets, including software and game security, identity management, intellectual property rights management and critical infrastructure security, according to the complaints.

Defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 for a System for Software Registration.

Uniloc is seeking compensatory damages, costs, interest and other relief deemed just and proper. A jury trial is requested.

The plaintiffs are represented by E. Leon Carter, J. Robert Arnett II and Ryan Loveless of Carter Sholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC in Dallas; James L. Etheridge of the Etheridge Law Group PLLC in Southlake; and T. John Ward Jr. and J. Wesley Hill of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview.

The cases have been assigned to District Judge Leonard E. Davis.

 

 

More News