Quantcast

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Friday, March 29, 2024

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

Patents

TYLER DIVISION

Aug. 17

IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd. 6:15-cv-00781-JRG-KNM

IDQ is the plaintiff.

It complains of purported infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,260,943 (the ‘943 patent) entitled “Apparatus and Method for Servicing a Coolant System”.

The ‘943 patent was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 28, 2007.

IDQ seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorney Allen Franklin Gardner of the law firm Potter Minton in Tyler.

MARSHALL DIVISION

Aug. 19

uLogin LLC v. Booking.com (USA) Inc 2:15-cv-01417-JRG-RSP

uLogin LLC v. The Gap Inc 2:15-cv-01418-JRG-RSP

uLogin LLC v. LivingSocial Inc 2:15-cv-01419-JRG-RSP

uLogin LLC v. Nordstrom Inc 2:15-cv-01420-JRG-RSP

Plaintiff uLogin is based in Plano.

It alleges infringement in relation to United States Patent No. 5,712,979 (the '979 patent), entitled “Method And Apparatus For Attaching Navigational History Information To Universal Resource Locator Links On A World Wide Web Page”.

The ‘979 patent was issued by the USPTO on June 27, 1998.

The technology recited in the claims of the '979 patent does not claim an abstract idea and provides an inventive concept, according to uLogin’s complaint.

Consequently, the plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorneys Richard C. Weinblatt and Andrew W. Spangler.

Aug. 21

Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Celgene Corporation 2:15-cv-01426

Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. General Electric Company 2:15-cv-01427

Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation 2:15-cv-01428

Plaintiff Marshall is based in Marshall.

The company has initiated legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,886,750 (the ‘750 patent) and 8,910,876 (the ‘876 patent), both of which are entitled “Method and Apparatus for Accessing Electronic Data via a Familiar Printed Medium”.

The inventors Spencer A. Rathus, Lois Fichner-Rathus and Jeffrey S. Nevid have been operating Marshall in Texas since 2004.

The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorney Austin Hansley of the law firm Austin Hansley PLLC in Dallas.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

VisionGeneral ElectricPlanoAeroMarshMarshallTylerUspto

More News