John Suayan Oct. 31, 2015, 8:33am


MARSHALL DIVISION

Oct. 26

Gene Reader LLC v. Molecular Devices LLC 2:15-cv-01676-JRG

Gene Reader LLC v. Roche NimbleGen Inc 2:15-cv-01677-JRG

The plaintiff Gene Reader is based in Plano.

It has initiated legal action to stop purported infringement of United States Patent Numbers 6,545,758 (the "'758 patent") and 6,567,163 (the "'163 patent"), both entitled "Microarray Detector and Synthesizer."

The ‘758 patent was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 8, 2003 while the ‘163 patent was issued on May 20, 2003.

Gene Reader seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

Attorneys Andrew W. Spangler of the law firm Spangler Law P.C. in Longview and Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt of the law firm Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC in Wilmington, Del., are representing the complainant.

Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Geotab USA, Inc. 2:15-cv-01679-RWS

Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Digital Communication Technologies LLC 2:15-cv-01680-RWS

The plaintiff Orthosie Systems is based in Allen.

Its complaint was filed on grounds U.S. Patent Number 7,430,471 (“the ‘471 Patent”), entitled “Method and System for Monitoring a Vehicle”, was infringed upon.

The ‘471 patent, which was issued on Sept. 30, 2008, is for sale products and/or systems, including, but not limited to DCT’s Syrus (TT, 2G, 3G and CloudConnect and Pegasus products and systems.

Consequently, the plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorney Ronald W. Burns of Frisco.

Oct. 29

Tangelo IP, LLC v. Euromarket Design, Inc. d/b/a Crate & Barrel 2:15-cv-01693-JRG

Tangelo IP, LLC v. HD Supply, Inc. et al 2:15-cv-01694-JRG

Tangelo IP, LLC v. Mary Kay, Inc. 2:15-cv-01695-JRG

Tangelo IP, LLC v. New Moosejaw, LLC 2:15-cv-01696-JRG

Tangelo IP, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al 2:15-cv-01697-JRG

Plano-based Tangelo is the plaintiff.

It seeks to stop what it asserts to be infringement of U.S. Patent Number 8,429,005, the ‘005 Patent, entitled “Method for Determining Effectiveness of Display of Objects in Advertising Images”.

The ‘005 Patent was issued on Apr. 23, 2013.

Consequently, Tangelo seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It hired attorneys John J. Edmonds, Stephen F. Schlather and Shea N. Palavan of the law firm Collins, Edmonds, Pogorzelski, Schlather & Tower, PLLC in Houston to serve as its counsel.

More News