Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

David Yates Jan. 4, 2016, 1:01pm


TYLER DIVISION

Dec. 30

Motile Optics v. Apex Digital 6:15-cv-0177-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics v. Digital Products International 6:15-cv-01178-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics v. Haier America Trading 6:15-cv-01179-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics, LLC v. Haier America Trading 6:15-cv-01179-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics, LLC v. Lanzer Holdings, LLC 6:15-cv-01180-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics, LLC v. Mica Electronics Corporation DBA VocoPro 6:15-cv-01181-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics, LLC v. Universal Electronics, Inc. 6:15-cv-01182-RWS-JDL

Motile Optics, LLC v. TMI Products, Inc. 6:15-cv-01183-RWS-JDL

The plaintiff is a Tyler company and is owner of patent No. 6,047,223 (the ‘223 Patent), entitled “Electronic computer having a magneto-optic unit,” which was duly and legally issued on April 4, 2000, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The plaintiff seeks a judgment stating that the defendants infringed on the ‘223 patent and seeks damages for the infringement.

California attorney Rasheed McWilliams represents the plaintiff

Dec. 28

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Avaya Inc. 6:15-cv-01168-JRG

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Shoretel, Inc. 6:15-cv-01169-JRG

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. 6:15-cv-01175-JRG

The plaintiff is a Plano company.

Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of U.S. Patent No. 7,804,948 (the ‘948 Patent), entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INITIATING A CONFERENCE CALL” that issued on Sept. 28, 2010.

The complaints state that Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ‘948 Patent with ownership of all substantial rights therein, including the right to grant sublicenses, to exclude others, and to enforce, sue and recover past damages for the infringement thereof.

Plano attorney Craig Tadlock represents the plaintiff.

More News