Quest NetTech Corporation v. Artix Entertainment LLC 2:16-cv-00250
Quest Nettech Corporation v. Budget Travel, LLC 2:16-cv-00251
Quest NetTech Corporation v. Emerald Expositions LLC 2:16-cv-00252
Quest NetTech Corporation v. Enervex, Inc. 2:16-cv-00253
Quest NetTech Corporation v. Enterplay LLC 2:16-cv-00254
Quest NetTech Corporation v. The Garden Shows Production Company Inc. 2:16-cv-00255
Quest NetTech Corporation v. Hannaford Bros. Co. LLC 2:16-cv-00256
Quest NetTech Corporation v. hhgregg, Inc. 2:16-cv-00258
Quest NetTech Corporation v. Madavor Media LLC 2:16-cv-00259
Quest NetTech Corporation v. ZAM Network LLC 2:16-cv-00260
Court papers list Quest as the plaintiff.
The company seeks to stop alleged infringement of United States Patent Number 5,508,731 C1 entitled “Generation of Enlarged Participatory Broadcast Audience.”
It is pursuing unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorneys Deron R. Dacus, Shannon Dacus and Pete Kerr of the law firm The Dacus Firm, P.C. in Tyler serve as Quest’s counsel.
Creative Technology Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation et al 2:16-cv-00262
Creative Technology Ltd. v. Sony Corporation et al 2:16-cv-00263
Creative Technology Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al 2:16-cv-00264
Creative Technology Ltd. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00265
Creative Technology Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al 2:16-cv-00266
Creative Technology Ltd. v. HTC Corporation et al 2:16-cv-00267
Creative Technology Ltd. v. Blackberry Ltd. et al 2:16-cv-00268
The plaintiff Creative is based in Singapore.
It has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,433.
Per court documents, the subject patent was issued to Creative on Aug. 9, 2005, and its associated inventions “have now become ubiquitous in the industry.”
Creative seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorney S. Calvin Capshaw of the law firm Capshaw Derieux LLP in Gladewater is representing the complainant.
Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Etekcity Corporation 2:16-cv-00270
Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Kworld (USA) Computer, Inc., d/b/a Gamdias 2:16-cv-00271
Better Mouse Company, LLC v. PC Gear Head, LLC, d/b/a Gear Head 2:16-cv-00272
Tyler-based Better Mouse is the plaintiff.
It asserts ownership of U.S. Patent No. 7,532,200, which is entitled “Apparatus for Setting Multi-Stage Displacement Resolution of a Mouse.”
“The ‘200 patent generally covers certain computer mice and other similar devices that have the ability to change resolutions through one or more toggles or switches on the exterior of the mouse, without using a software driver or tool that is external to the mouse,” according to court documents.
Better Mouse seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorneys Larry D. Thompson, Jr., Matthew J. Antonelli and Zachariah S. Harrington of the law firm Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson LLP and Stafford Davis of The Stafford Davis Firm, PC in Tyler serve as the complainant’s counsel.