WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) – Two attorneys on opposite sides of a debate over payments to asbestos victims took part Friday in a policy debate presented by the Congressional Civil Justice Caucus Academy.

Nathan Finch of plaintiffs firm Motley Rice and James Stengel of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe disagreed over whether information gathered during payments made by bankruptcy trusts to victims of asbestos exposure should be shared in court cases filed by the same victims.

Read more on Legal Newsline ...

More News