Marshall Division 

June 2 

• RecruitMe v. Avid Life Media Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00443

• RecruitMe v. Zoosk Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00444

• RecruitMe v. IAC/InterActiveCorp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00445

RecruitMe LLP is a Texas limited liability company, having a principal place of business in Plano.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,623,660 issued April 22, 1997, for System for Regulating Access to Data Base for Purpose of Data Base Management.

The plaintiff is asking for an injunction and for an award of damages, interest and court costs.

RecruitMe is represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas. A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

June 3

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Fonality Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00446

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Fringland Ltd. Case No. 2:13-cv-00447

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. textPlus Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00448

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Firespotter Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00449

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00450

June 4

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Ooma Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00454

June 6

• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Vocalcity Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00471

Telinit is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Plano.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,192,123 issued Feb. 20, 2001, for Method and Apparatus for Initiating Telephone Calls Using a Data Network.

The plaintiff is asking the court to enjoin the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, enhanced damages, interest, court costs and attorney’s fees.

Telinit is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Firm PC in Longview and Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola of Ferraiuoli LLC in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.

 

June 3

• National Cheng Kung University v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00452

June 4

• National Cheng Kung University v. Philips International Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00453

June 5

• National Cheng Kung University v. Nokia Corp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00464

• National Cheng Kung University v. Seoul Semiconductor Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00465

• National Cheng Kung University v. Cree Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00466

• National Cheng Kung University v. Nichia Corp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00467

• National Cheng Kung University v. Toshiba Corp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00468

• National Cheng Kung University v. Qualcomm Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00469

• National Cheng Kung University v. Cisco Systems Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00470

National Cheng Kung University is a higher education institution located in Taiwan.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,561,078 issued July 14, 2009, for System and Method for Encoding a Data Set.

National Cheng Kung University is asking the court to issue an injunction and for an award of damages, costs, expenses, interest and enhanced damages.

The plaintiff is represented by Winston O. Huff and Deborah Jagai of W. O. Huff & Associates PLLC in Dallas. A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.

 

June 4

• Eclipse IP v. Kohls Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00456

• Eclipse IP v. Saks Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00457

• Eclipse IP v. Papa Johns Intl. Case No. 2:13-cv-00458

• Eclipse IP v. Foodler LLC Case No. 2:13-cv-00459

• Eclipse IP v. GoWaiter Business Holdings Case No. 2:13-cv-00460

Eclipse is a Florida company with its principal address in Delray Beach, Fla.

The defendant is accused of infringing on:

• U.S. Patent No. 7,876,239 issued Jan. 25, 2011, for Secure Notification Messaging Systems and Methods Using Authentication Indicia;

• U. S. Patent No. 7,319,414 issued Jan. 15, 2008, for Secure Notification Messaging Systems and Methods Using Authentication Indicia; and

• U.S. Patent No. 7,119,716 issued October 10, 2006, for Response Systems and Methods for Notification Systems for Modifying Future Notifications.

Eclipse is asking for an award of damages, interest, enhanced damages, attorney’s fees and court costs.

The plaintiff is represented by Melissa R. Smith of Gillam & Smith in Marshall and Matthew S. Harman and Eric S. Fredrickson of Harman Law LLC in Atlanta, Ga.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.

 

June 5

• Activision TV Inc. v. CenturyLink Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00462

Activision TV is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business in Naples, Fla.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,369,058 issued May 6, 2008, for Remote Control Electronic Display System and U.S. Patent No. 8,330,613 issued Dec. 11, 2012, for Remote Control Electronic Display System.

Activision is asking the court to enjoin the defendant from further infringement and for an award of damages, enhanced damages, interest, court costs and attorney’s fees.

The plaintiff is represented by Jennifer Parker Ainsworth of Wilson, Robertson & Cornelius P.C. in Tyler.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

• LBS Innovations v. Waze Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00463

LBS Innovations is a New Jersey limited liability company with its principal place of business in Wanaque, N.J.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,091,956 issued July 18, 2000, for Situation Information System.

The plaintiff is asking for an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

LBS Innovations are represented by Christopher M. Joe, Eric W. Buether, Niky Bukovcan and Mark D. Perantie of Buether Joe & Carpenter in Dallas.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

June 6

• Adrain v. Coban Technologies Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00473

June 7

• Adrain v. L-3 Communications Mobile-Vision Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00477

• Adrain v. Hubb Systems LLC d/b/a Data911 Case No. 2:13-cv-00478

Adrain is an individual residing in Spokane County, Wash.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,831,669 issued Nov. 3, 1998, for Facility Monitoring System with Image Memory and Correlation.

Adrain is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

The plaintiff is represented by John T. Polasek, C. Dale Quisenberry and Jeffrey S. David of Polasek Quisenberry & Errington LLP in Bellaire; Otis W. Carroll and Deborah Race of Ireland Carroll & Kelley PC in Tyler; S. Calvin Capshaw, Elizabeth L. DeRieux and D. Jeffrey Rambin of Capshaw Derieux LLP in Gladewater; and Russell R. Smith of Fairchild, Price, Haley, & Smith LLP in Nacogdoches.

A jury trial is requested.

 

Tyler Division

June 3

• Blue Calypso v. Foursquare Labs Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00454

• Blue Calypso v. Groupon Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00455

• Blue Calypso v. Izea Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00456

• Blue Calypso v. MyLikes Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00457

• Blue Calypso v. Yelp Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00458

Blue Calypso Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in Dallas.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,452,646 issued May 28, 2013, for System and Method for Providing Endorsed Electronic Offers Between Communication Devices.

Blue Calypso is asking the court to enjoin the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

The plaintiff is represented by Thomas M. Melsheimer, Carl E. Bruce, David B. Conrad and Robert E. Hillman of Fish & Richardson P.C. in Dallas; and Jack Wesley Hill of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the case.

 

June 4

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Digiboo Case No. 6:13-cv-00460

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Books-A-Million Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00461

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00462

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Kobo Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00463

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Rhapsody International Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00465

• Innovative Automation LLC v. Sony Corp. of America et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00466

Innovative Automation is a limited liability corporation with a principal place of business in San Jose, Calif.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,174,362 C1 issued Feb. 6, 2007, for Method and System for Supplying Products from Pre-stored Digital Data in Response to Demands Transmitted via Computer Network and U.S. Patent No. 7,392,283 issued June 24, 2008, for Method and System for Supplying Products from Pre-stored Digital Data in Response to Demands Transmitted via Computer Network.

Innovative Automation is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, interest and court costs.

The plaintiff is represented by Adam J. Gutride, Seth A. Safier, Todd Kennedy, Anthony J. Patek and Marie A. McCrary of San Francisco, Calif.; Victoria L.H. Booke and Peter Ajlouny of Booke & Ajlouny LLP in San Jose, Calif.; and Charles Ainsworth of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth in Tyler.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis is assigned to the case.

 

More News