MARSHALL DIVISION
Jan. 4
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Google Inc. 2:16-cv-00002-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et al 2:16-cv-00007-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Bright House Networks, LLC et al 2:16-cv-00008-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v Charter Communications Inc 2:16-cv-00009-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc. 2:16-cv-00010-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Aruba Networks, Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00012-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 2:16-cv-00013-JRG-RSP
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. 2:16-cv-00014-JRG-RSP
The plaintiff MTel has initiated legal action to stop alleged infringement of United States Patent Numbers 5,809,428 (the “’428 Patent”), 5,754,946 (the “’946 Patent”), 5,581,804 (the “’804 Patent”), and 5,894,506 (the “’506 Patent”).
It consequently seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorneys Daniel R. Scardino, Craig S. Jepson and Raymond W. Mort of the law firm Reed & Scardino LLP in Austin are representing MTel.
Jan. 5
High Frequency Trading Systems LLC v. Forex Capital Markets, LLC 2:16-cv-00018-RWS
High Frequency Trading Systems LLC v. TMC Bonds LLC 2:16-cv-00020-RWS
The plaintiff HFTS has alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,231,363 (“the ’363 patent”).
Per HFTS’s complaint, it is the owner of the patent in question, entitled “Method and System for Rebrokering Orders in a Trading System,” with Webster Hughes and Charles Fefferman as its inventors.
The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorneys Robert Kiddie and Timothy Devlin of the Devlin Law Firm LLC in Wilmington, Del.