Marshall Division

Dec. 13

  • PT Diagnostics v. United Technologies Corp.
  • PT Diagnostics v. Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. et al
  • PT Diagnostics v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
  • PT Diagnostics v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

    Plaintiff PT Diagnostics is a Texas limited liability company having a principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are United Technologies Corp., Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp., CAMP Systems International Inc., Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. and Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on:

  • U.S. Patent No. 6,567,729 issued May 20, 2003, for System And Method Of Analyzing Aircraft Removal Data For Preventative Maintenance;
  • U.S. Patent No. 6,732,027 issued May 4, 2004, for System And Method Of Analyzing Operational Source Data;
  • U.S. Patent No. 6,959,236 issued Oct. 25, 2005, for System And Method Of Analyzing Operational Source Data; and
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,359,777 issued April 15, 2008, for System And Method Of Analyzing Aircraft Removal Data for Preventative Maintenance.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction and for an award of damages, costs, expenses and interest.

    A jury trial is requested.

    PT Diagnostics is represented by Matthew D. Orwig, Basheer Y. Ghorayeb, and Steven M. Geiszler of SNR Denton US of Dallas and Mark L. Hogge and Shailendra Maheshwari of SNR Denton US of Washington, D.C.

    U.S. District Judge David Folsom is assigned to the case.

    Case Nos. 2:11-cv-00507; 2:11-cv-00508; 2:11-cv-00509; 2:11-cv-00510

  • Luv N'Care Ltd. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al

    Plaintiff Luv N'Care is a corporation having a principal place of business in Monroe, La.

    The defendants are Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corp. and Avent Ltd.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on:

  • U.S. Patent No. 7,204,386 B2 issued April 17, 2007,
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,243,814 B2 issued July 17, 2007,
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,789,263 B2 issued Sept. 7, 2010, and
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,789,264 B2 issued Sept. 7, 2010.

    The patents are for a No-Spill Drinking Cup Apparatus.

    Defendants' allegedly infringing products include their entire lines of Magic Cups, Insulated Cups, Fast Flow Spouts, Hard Spouts and their line of Soft Spouts.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of lost sales, lost profits and damage to its reputation and good will, and/or disgorgement of Defendants' revenues and profits, treble damages, punitive damages, interest and court costs.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Luv N'Care is represented by Morris E. Cohen and Lee A. Goldberg of Goldberg Cohen in New York and Joe D. Guerriero of Monroe, La.

    U.S. District Judge David Folsom is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 2:11-cv-00512

    Dec. 14

  • Webvention v. A/X Armani Exchange et al
  • Webvention v. Alliance Entertainment

    Webvention is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Marshall.

    The defendants are A/X Armani Exchange, Presidio International Inc. and Alliance Entertainment.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5, 251,294 issued Oct. 5, 1993, for Accessing, Assembling, and Using Bodies of Information.

    Webvention states the infringement of the '294 patent is occurring through each defendants' respective websites.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from continued acts of infringement and for an award of damages, costs, treble damages, interest, attorney's fees and court costs.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Webvention is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Law Firm in Longview; and Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Debra Coleman of Albritton Law Firm in Longview.

    Case No. 2:11-cv-00513; 2:11-cv-00517

    Tyler Division

    Dec. 12

  • U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. IC Intracom Holdings et al

    USEI is Texas limited liability company with a principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are IC Intracom Holdings and IC Intracom USA.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,732,094 issued March 24, 1998, for Method for Automatic Initiation of Data Transmission; U.S. Patent No. 5,434,872 issued July 18, 1995, for Apparatus for Automatic Initiation of Data Transmission; and U.S. Patent No. 5,307,459 issued April 26, 1994 for Network Adapter with Host Indication Optimization.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest and court costs.

    A jury trial is requested.

    USEI is represented by T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview and John C. Herman, Ryan K. Walsh, Peter M. Jones and David L. Gann of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP in Atlanta, Ga.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00665

    Dec. 16

  • Profectus Technology v. Motorola Mobility Inc.
  • Profectus Technology v. Motorola Solutions Inc.
  • Profectus Technology v. Hewlett-Packard Co. et al.
  • Profectus Technology v. Acer Inc. et al

    Plaintiff Profectus Technology is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Dix Hills, N.Y.

    The defendants are Motorola Mobility Inc., Motorola Solutions Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., Hewlett-Packard Development Co., Acer Inc. and Acer America Corp.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on of U.S. Patent Number 6,975,308 issued Dec. 13, 2005 for Digital Picture Display Frame.

    Profectus is asking the Court for an award of damages, interest and court costs.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Steven E. Ross of Ross IP Group in Dallas is representing the plaintiff.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00674; 6:11-cv-00675; 6:11-cv-00676; 6:11-cv-00677

  • More News