Marshall Division
Feb. 3
Lumetique Inc. is a California corporation and develops and sells home fragrance products under the DayNa Decker brand name.
The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Design Patent D644,360; D644,359; and D643,554 relating to wood wick technology.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, including lost profits, a reasonable royalty, treble damages for willful infringement, attorney's fees, punitive damages and interest.
A jury trial is requested.
Steven J. Mitby and Amir Alavi of Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Anaipakos, PC in Houston represent Lumetique.
U.S. District Judge David Folsom is assigned to the case.
Case No. 2:12-cv-00047; 2:12-cv-00048; 2:12-cv-00049; 2:12-cv-00050; 2:12-cv-00051
Tyler Division
Jan. 30
MacroSolve is an Oklahoma corporation with a principal place of business in Tulsa, Okla.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816 issued for Oct. 26, 2010, for System and Method for Data Management.
The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, interest, court costs and attorney's fees.
A jury trial is requested.
Matthew J. Antonelli, Zachariah S. Harrington, Larry D. Thompson, Jr. and Kris Y. Teng of Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson in Houston represent MacroSolve.
U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.
Case No. 6:12-cv-000444; 6:12-cv-00045; 6:12-cv-00046; 6:12-cv-00047; 6:12-cv-00048
Jan. 31
Landmark Technology is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.
The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 issued Nov. 19, 1996, for Automated Sales and Services System; U.S. Patent No. 6,289,319 issued Sept. 11, 2001, for Automated Business and Financial Transaction Processing System; and U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 issued March 7, 2006, for Automated Multimedia Data Processing Network.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, reasonable royalty or lost profits, enhanced damages, court costs, attorney's fees and interest.
A jury trial is requested.
Landmark Technology is represented by Charles Ainsworth and Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth PC in Tyler; and Stanley M. Gibson and Gregory S. Cordey of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP in Los Angeles, Calif.
U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis is assigned to the case.
Case No. 6:12-cv-00050