Marshall Division

Feb. 17

  • Stambler v. Newegg Inc.

    Plaintiff Leon Stambler is an individual residing in Parkland, Fla.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,936,541 issued Aug. 10, 1999, for Method for Securing Information Relevant to a Transaction.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an award of damages, interest, treble damages, attorney's fees and court costs.

    Stambler is represented by Brent N. Bumgardner, Edward R. Nelson III, Christie B. Lindsey and Ryan P. Griffin of Nelson Bumgardner Casto P.C. in Fort Worth; Eric M. Albritton of Albritton Law Firm in Longview; T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview; and Frisco attorney Ronald A. Dubner.

    Case No. 2:12-cv-00078

    Sherman Division

    Feb. 13

  • Gemini IP v. Consona Corp.
  • Gemini IP v. Kaseya International Limited et al

    Plaintiff Gemini IP is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are Consona Corp., Kaseya International Ltd. and Kaseya US Sales.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,177,932 issued Jan. 23, 2001, for Method and Apparatus for Network Based Customer Services.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction and an award of damages, costs, expenses, interest and attorney's fees.

    Gemini is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Firm in Longview and James C. Otteson, David A. Caine and Xiang Long of Agility IP Law in East Palo Alto, Calif.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Richard S. Schell is assigned to the case.

    Case Nos. 4:12-cv-00080; 4:12-cv-00081

    Tyler Division

    Feb. 17

  • Landmark Technology v. New York & Company Inc.

    Landmark Technology is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 issued Nov. 19, 1996, for Automated Sales and Services System; U.S. Patent No. 6,289,319 issued Sept. 11, 2001, for Automated Business and Financial Transaction Processing System; and U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 issued March 7, 2006, for Automated Multimedia Data Processing Network.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, reasonable royalty or lost profits, enhanced damages, court costs, attorney's fees and interest.

    Landmark Technology is represented by Charles Ainsworth and Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth PC in Tyler; and Stanley M. Gibson and Gregory S. Cordey of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP in Los Angeles, Calif.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:12-cv-00073

  • More News