Quantcast

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

Marshall Division

Aug. 17

  • Qxzab v. Lake Pointe Operating Co.

    Qxzab is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Longview.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,832,488 issued Nov. 3, 1998, for Computer Systems and Method for Storing Medical Records Using a Smart Card to Store Data.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction and for an award of damages, not less than a reasonable royalty, plus interest, court costs and attorney's fees.

    Qxzab is represented by Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview and James A. Fussell III of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Alexandria, Va.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 2:12-cv-00491

  • Quxuz v. Automattic Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00492
  • Quxuz v. BigCommerce Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00493
  • Quxuz v. Element Fusion Case No. 2:12-cv-00494
  • Quxuz v. Soholaunch Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00495

    Quxuz is a Texas limited liability company having a principal place of business in Longview.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,353,199 issued April 1, 2008, for Method of Moderating External Access to an Electronic Document Authoring Development and Distribution.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an award of damages, interest, court costs and attorney's fees.

    Quxuz is represented by Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview and James A. Fussell, III of Spangler & Fussell in Alexandria, Va.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

    Aug. 23

  • TQP Development v.  The Weather Channel Case No. 2:12-cv-00502
  • TQP Development v. Twitter Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00503
  • TQP Development v. Dow Jones & Co. Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00504
  • TQP Development v. NBA Media Ventures et al. Case No. 2:12-cv-00505
  • TQP Development v. Net-a-Porter Case No. 2:12-cv-00506
  • TQP Development v. Simply Hired Inc. Case No. 2:12-cv-00507

    TQP Development is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Marshall.

    TQP Development accuses the defendants of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 issued May 2, 1995, for Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.

    The defendants are accused of willful infringement of the '730 patent.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction preventing the defendants from continued acts of infringement and for an award of damages, interest and costs.

    TQP Development is represented by Marc A. Fenster, Alex C. Giza, Adam S. Hoffman and Kevin Burke of Russ, August & Kabat in Los Angeles, Calif.; Hao Ni of Ni Law Firm in Dallas; and Andrew Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Tyler Division

    Aug. 17

  • Meadows Financial Systems v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG

    Meadows is a Texas corporation with a principal place in Marshall.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,064,434 issued Nov. 22, 2011, for Method for Providing Internet Services to a Telephone User.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an award of damages, interest, court costs, and attorney's fees.

    Meadows is represented by Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview and James A. Fussell III of Spangler & Fussell in Alexandria, Va.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:12-cv-00542

  • EMG Technology v. The Vanguard Group Inc.

    EMG is a California limited liability company organized with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, Calif.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196 issued on Oct. 21, 2008, for Apparatus and Method of Manipulating a Region on a Wireless Device for Viewing, Zooming and Scrolling Internet Content.

    EMG is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, including royalty or lost profits, enhanced damages, interest, attorney's fees and court costs.

    The plaintiff is represented by Charles Ainsworth and Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth in Tyler; and Stanley Gibson and Gregory S. Cordey of Jeffer Mangels Butler Mitchell in Los Angeles, Calif.  

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:12-cv-00543

    Aug. 17
  • Blue Spike v. Miranda Technologies. et al Case No. 6:12-cv-00544

    Aug. 22
  • Blue Spike v. Yahoo! Inc. Case No. 6:12-cv-00556
  • Blue Spike v. Civolution USA Inc. et al Case No. 6:12-cv-00557
  • Blue Spike v. Google Inc. Case No. 6:12-cv-00558
  • Blue Spike v. Adobe Systems Inc. Case No. 6:12-cv-00564
  • Blue Spike v. Umami Co. Case No. 6:12-cv-00565

    Aug. 23
  • Blue Spike v. Irdeto USA Inc. et al Case No. 6:12-cv-00567
  • Blue Spike v. Zeitera et al Case No. 6:12-cv-00568
  • Blue Spike v. WiOffer Case No. 6:12-cv-00570

    Blue Spike LLC is a Texas limited liability company and has its headquarters and principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on:

  • U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472 issued March 18, 2008, for Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals;
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700 issued Feb. 9, 2010, for Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals;
  • U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 issued May 24, 2011, for Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals; and
  • U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175 issued July 3, 2012, for Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest and attorney's fees.

    Blue Spike is represented by Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield of Albritton Law Firm in Longview; and Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns of Garteiser Honea P.C. in San Rafael, Calif.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Aug. 20

  • NobelBiz Inc. v. Connect First Inc.

    NobelBiz is a privately held Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Carlsbad, Calif.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,135,122 issued March 13, 2012, for System and Method for Modifying Communication Information (MCI).

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, lost profits, treble damages, interest, court costs and attorney fees.

    NobelBiz is represented by S. Calvin Capshaw, Elizabeth L. DeRieux and D. Jeffrey Rambin of Capshaw DeRieux in Gladewater; and Ralph A. Dengler, Charles H. Chevalier and William A. Hector of Gibbons P.C. in Newark, N.J.  

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:12-cv-00549

  • ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

    More News