Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

Marshall Division

May 28

• Datatreasury v. Fiserv Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00431 

• Datatreasury v. Fidelity National Information Services Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00432

• Datatreasury v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00433

DataTreasury Corp. is a Delaware corporation that maintains its principal place of business in Plano.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. U.S. 5,910,988 issued June 8, 1999, and U.S. Patent No. 6,032,137 issued Feb. 29, 2000, for an Invention in Remote Image Capture with Centralized Processing and Storage.

DataTreasury is asking the court to issue an injunction to stop further infringement and for an award of damages, enhanced damages, attorney’s fees, interest and court costs.

The plaintiffs are represented by Nelson J. Roach and Derek Gilliland of Nix Patterson & Roach in Daingerfield; C. Cary Patterson, Brady Paddock and R. Benjamin King in Texarkana; and Anthony Bruster, Rod Cooper, Edward Chin, Nicole Reed Kliewer and Andrew Wright of Nix Patterson & Roach in Irving.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.

 

May 29

• TQP Development v. Wellpoint Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00435

TQP Development is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Marshall.

TQP Development accuses the defendants of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 issued May 2, 1995, for Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.

The defendant is accused of willful infringement of the ‘730 patent.

The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction preventing the defendants from continued acts of infringement and for an award of damages, interest and costs.

TQP Development is represented by Marc A. Fenster, Alex C. Giza, Adam S. Hoffman and Kevin Burke of Russ, August & Kabat in Los Angeles, Calif.; Hao Ni of Ni Law Firm in Dallas; and Andrew Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview.

A jury trial is requested.

 

Tyler Division

May 24

• Adaptix Inc. v. Pantech Co. Ltd et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00424

May 28

• Adaptix Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00432

• Adaptix Inc. v. ASUSTek et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00433

• Adaptix Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00434

• Adaptix Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00435

• Adaptix Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00436

• Adaptix Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00437

• Adaptix Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00438

• Adaptix Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00439

• Adaptix Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00440

• Adaptix Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00441

• Adaptix Inc. v. Sony Mobile Communications Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00442

• Adaptix Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00443

• Adaptix Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00444

• Adaptix Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00445

• Adaptix Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00446

Adaptix is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Carrollton.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,454,212 and U.S. Patent No. 6,947,748 issued for OFDMA with Adaptive Subcarrier-Cluster Configuration and Selective Loading.

Adaptix is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages and interest.

The plaintiff is represented by Paul J. Hayes and Dean G. Bostock of Hayes, Bostock & Cronin in Andover, Massachusetts and Craig Tadlock and Keith Smiley of Tadlock Law Firm PLLC in Plano.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the cases.

 

May 27

• Blue Calypso Inc. v. Foursquare Labs Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00425

• Blue Calypso Inc. v. Groupon Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00426

• Blue Calypso Inc. v. Yelp Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00427

• Blue Calypso Inc. v. MyLikes Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00428

• Blue Calypso Inc. v. Izea Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00429

Blue Calypso Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located in Dallas.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,452,646 issued May 28, 2013, for System and Method for Providing Endorsed Electronic Offers Between Communication Devices.

Blue Calypso is asking the court to enjoin the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

The plaintiff is represented by Thomas M. Melsheimer, Carl E. Bruce, David B. Conrad and Robert E. Hillman of Fish & Richardson P.C. in Dallas; and Jack Wesley Hill of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview. Jury trials are requested.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the case.

 

May 29

• Smartflash et al v. Apple Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00447

• Smartflash et al v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00448

Smartflash LLC is a limited liability corporation and maintains its principal place of business in Tyler.

Smartflash Technologies Limited is a limited company and maintains a principal place of business on the island of Tortola.

The defendants are accused of infringing on:

• U.S. Patent No. 7,334,720 issued Feb. 26, 2008;

• U.S. Patent No. 7,942,317 issued May 17, 2011;

• U.S. Patent No. 8,033,458 issued Oct. 11, 2011;

• U.S. Patent No. 8,061,598 issued Nov. 22, 2011;

• U.S. Patent No. 8,118,221 issued Feb. 21, 2012; and

• U.S. Patent No. 8,336,772 issued Dec. 25, 2012, for Data Storage and Access Systems.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, court costs, attorney’s fees and interest.

Smartflash is represented by Bradley W. Caldwell, Jason D. Cassady, John Austin Curry, Daniel R. Pearson and Hamad M. Hamad of Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C. in Dallas; and T. John Ward and T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview. A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the cases.