Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

MARSHALL DIVISION

Oct. 7 

• ComCam International Inc. v. AT&T Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00795

Oct. 8

• ComCam International Inc. v. Brivo Systems Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00796

• ComCam International Inc. v. Lifeshield Security Case No. 2:13-cv-00797

• ComCam International Inc. v. Mobotix Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00798

• ComCam International Inc. v. Monitronics International Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00799

• ComCam International Inc. v. Protect America Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00800

ComCam International is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in Exon, Penn.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,975,220 for Internet Based Security, Fire and Emergency Identification and Communication System.

The plaintiff is asking for an award of damages, court costs, interest and attorney’s fees.

ComCam is represented by Eric M. Albritton of Albritton Law Firm in Longview and William M. Parrish, Jay D. Ellwanger and Stefanie T. Scott of Dinovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP in Austin.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

Oct. 9

• Telinit Technologies v. Spotify USA Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00803

Telinit Technologies is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Plano.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,016,942 issued March 21, 2006, for Dynamic Hosting.

The plaintiff is asking the court to enjoin the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, enhanced damages, interest, court costs and attorney’s fees.

Telinit is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Firm PC in Longview and Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola of Ferraiuoli LLC in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

TYLER DIVISION

Oct. 7

• Blue Spike LLC v. DDM Brands Case No. 6:13-cv-00751

• Blue Spike LLC v. Oppo Digital Inc. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00752

• Blue Spike LLC v. InfoSonics Corp. et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00753

Blue Spike is a Texas limited liability company with its headquarters and principal place of business in Tyler.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,745,569 Method for Stega-Cipher Protection of Computer Code.

The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest and attorney’s fees.

Blue Spike is represented by Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns of Garteiser Honea P.C. in Tyler; and Kirk J. Anderson and Peter S. Brasher of Garteiser Honea P.C. in San Rafael, Calif.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the case.

 

Oct. 10

• Landmark Technology v. The ADT Corp. Case No. 6:13-cv-00758

• Landmark Technology v. The Bon-Ton Stores Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00759

• Landmark Technology v. Briggs & Stratton Corp. Case No. 6:13-cv-00760

• Landmark Technology v. Brunswick Corp. Case No. 6:13-cv-00761

• Landmark Technology v. Geeknet Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00762

• Landmark Technology v. Genesco Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00763

• Landmark Technology v. Genuine Parts Co. Case No. 6:13-cv-00764

• Landmark Technology v. Gregg Appliances Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00765

• Landmark Technology v. Hugo Boss USA Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00766

• Landmark Technology v. The Jones Group Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00767

• Landmark Technology v. Nacco Industries Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00768

• Landmark Technology v. Samsonite Case No. 6:13-cv-00769

Landmark Technology is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 issued Nov. 19, 1996, for Automated Sales and Services System and U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 issued March 7, 2006, for Automated Multimedia Data Processing Network.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, reasonable royalty or lost profits, enhanced damages, court costs, attorney’s fees and interest.

Landmark Technology is represented by Charles Ainsworth and Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth PC in Tyler and Stanley M. Gibson of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP of Los Angeles, Calif.

A jury trial is requested

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider is assigned to the cases.