Quantcast

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

Patents

MARSHALL DIVISION

Nov. 23

Bush Seismic Technologies, LLC v. NEOS Geosolutions, Inc. 2:15-cv-01808-JRG

Bush Seismic Technologies, LLC v. Global Geophysical Services, Inc 2:15-cv-01809-JRG

Texas-based Bush Seismic Technologies is the plaintiff.

The company asserts ownership of United States Patent Number 6,411,903 (“the ’903 patent”), claiming it had been infringed upon.

The ‘903 patent, titled “System and Method for Delineating Spatially Dependent Objects, Such as Hydrocarbon Accumulations from Seismic Data,” was issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on June 25, 2002.

According to the complaint, the inventions of the ’903 patent resolve technical problems related to the use of artificial neural networks, a type of special purpose computer, in the exploration of oil, gas and/or minerals.

“For example, the inventions disclose how artificial neural networks can be used to discriminate between different regions, accumulations, or clusters of hydrocarbon deposits that can be detected from patterns present in seismic data,” the lawsuit says.

The complainant seeks to recover unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorney Robert D. Kiddie of the Devlin Law Firm, PLLC in Wilmington, Del.

Nov. 24

Network Architecture Innovations LLC v. AdFairX Consultants, LLC 2:15-cv-01840

Network Architecture Innovations LLC v. Beronata Services Ltd. 2:15-cv-01841

Network Architecture Innovations LLC v. Bulova Invest Ltd. 2:15-cv-01842

Network Architecture Innovations LLC v. Hammy Media Ltd. 2:15-cv-01843

Network Architecture Innovations LLC v. Praestone Services Ltd. 2:15-cv-01844

Texas-based Network Architecture Innovations is the plaintiff.

It intends to stop what it believes to be infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5, 974,451 (the ’451 patent).

The ‘451 patent was issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 8, 2003.

The plaintiff seeks to recover unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

Nov. 25

Mozly Tech LLC v. Avaya Inc. 2:15-cv-01888

Mozly Tech LLC v. BlackBerry Corporation 2:15-cv-01889

Mozly Tech LLC v. Bullhorn, Inc. 2:15-cv-01890

Mozly Tech LLC v. Deltek, Inc. 2:15-cv-01891

Mozly Tech LLC v. Goldmine a Division of HEAT Software USA, Inc. 2:15-cv-01892

Mozly Tech LLC v. HTC Corporation et al 2:15-cv-01893

Mozly Tech LLC v. Infor (US), Inc. 2:15-cv-01894

Plaintiff Mozly Tech is based in Plano.

It has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,367,044 titled “System and Method for Network Operation.”

The complainant consequently seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson, D. Bradley Kizzia and Anthony Ricciardelli of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

VisionNeosPlanoMarshall

More News