June 6

Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00588-WCB

Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. CenturyLink, Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00589-WCB

Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00590-WCB

Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00591-WCB

Reno, Nev.-based Sycamore is the plaintiff.

Sycamore has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of United States Patent Number 6,952,405.

Per recent court documents, the ‘405 patent, entitled “Coding Scheme Using a Transaction Indicator for Signal Transmission in Optical Communications Networks,” was issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 4, 2005 with Drs. Danny Tsang and Murat Azizoglu as the listed inventors.

The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorneys Otis Carroll and Deborah Rice of the law firm Ireland Carroll & Kelley, P.C. in Tyler.

June 7

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al 2:16-cv-00594-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Actiontec Electronics, Inc. 2:16-cv-00596-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Auntie Anne's LLC 2:16-cv-00597-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc. 2:16-cv-00598-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Kwikset Corporation 2:16-cv-00599-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Netgear Inc. 2:16-cv-00600-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. 2:16-cv-00601-JRG

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Waterpik, Inc. 2:16-cv-00602-JRG

The plaintiff Symbology is based in Plano.

It seeks to stop purported infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,424,752; 8,651,369; and 8,936,190.

“The defendants’ actions complained of herein will continue unless the defendants are enjoined by this court,” court papers assert.

“The defendants’ actions complained of herein are causing irreparable harm and monetary damage to the plaintiff and will continue to do so unless and until the defendants are enjoined and restrained by this court.”

Consequently, Symbology seeks unspecified monetary damages.

The plaintiff is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson, D. Bradley Kizzia, and Anthony Ricciardelli of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas.

June 8

Effective Exploration, LLC v. Bluestone Natural Resources II, LLC 2:16-cv-00607-JRG-RSP

Effective Exploration, LLC v. Enervest Operating LLC 2:16-cv-00608-JRG-RSP

Effective Exploration, LLC v. Vantage Fort Worth Energy, LLC 2:16-cv-00609-JRG-RSP

Effective Exploration, LLC v. Trinity River Energy Operating, LLC et al 2:16-cv-00610-JRG-RSP

Effective Exploration, LLC v. EXCO Operating Company, LP et al 2:16-cv-00611-JRG-RSP

Plano-based Effective Exploration is the plaintiff.

It claims ownership of U.S. Patent No. 8,813,840, entitled “Method and System for Accessing Subterranean Deposits from The Surface and Tools Therefor.”

Effective Exploration seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

Attorneys Steven R. Daniels and Bryan D. Atkinson of the law firm Farney Daniels PC in Georgetown are representing the complainant.

More News