MARSHALL DIVISION
Oct. 24
COQUI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. CASHSTAR INC. 2:16-cv-01192-RWS
COQUI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. GYFT, INC. 2:16-cv-01194-RWS
COQUI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. TRANSACTION WIRELESS, INC. 2:16-cv-01195-RWS
COQUI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. GIVEX USA CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01196-RWS
The plaintiff Coqui Technologies is based in McKinney.
Asserting ownership of United States Patent Number 7,580,864, the company is pursuing legal action in response to what it asserts was infringement.
Recent court documents show that the ‘864 patent, entitled “Method for Circulating an Electronic Gift Certificate in Online and Offline System,” was issued on Aug. 25, 2009. They list Hee-Jung Ahn is listed as the inventor of the patent in question.
The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorneys Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand, Stevenson Moore V, and Krystal L. McCool of the law firm Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC in Dallas.
Oct. 28
OROSTREAM LLC V. CARBONITE, INC. 2:16-cv-01205-JRG
OROSTREAM LLC V. CODE42 SOFTWARE, INC. 2:16-cv-01206-JRG
OROSTREAM LLC V. DROPBOX, INC. 2:16-cv-01207-JRG
OROSTREAM LLC V. IDRIVE INC. 2:16-cv-01208-JRG
OROSTREAM LLC V. KEEPITSAFE, INC. 2:16-cv-01209-JRG
OROSTREAM LLC V. QNAP, INC. 2:16-cv-01210-JRG
The plaintiff Orostream is based in Plano.
It claims ownership of U.S. Patent No. 5,768,508, known as “Computer Network System and Method for Efficient Information Transfer.”
Per recent court documents, the application leading to the ‘508 patent was filed on Apr. 11, 1997, and the patent itself was issued on June 16, 1998.
“The ‘508 patent has been cited as prior art during the prosecution history of over 100 subsequently-issued United States patents, including patents assigned to IBM, Intel, Facebook, Gateway, Hitachi, Microsoft, Nokia, Oracle, and Veritas Software,” the complaints state.
Orostream seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorney David R. Bennett of the law firm Direction IP Law in Chicago.