IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. ET AL 2:17-cv-00744-JRG
The plaintiff Iron Oak is based in Richland Hills.
It has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of United States Patent Numbers 5,699,275 and 5,966,658.
Recent court documents show that the ‘275 patent was issued on Dec. 16, 1997 and is directed to a system and method for remote patching of operating code located in a mobile unit while the ‘658 patent was issued on Oct. 12, 1999 and is directed to the automated selection of a communication path.
Iron Oak seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorneys Robert J. McAughan, Jr and Albert B. Deaver, Jr. of the law firm Sutton McAughan Deaver PLLC in Houston.
SPYCURITY LLC V. GRANDSTREAM NETWORKS, INC. 5:17-cv-00192-RWS
Frisco-based Spycurity is the plaintiff.
It claims ownership of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,118.
According to recent court papers, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued the ‘118 patent, entitled “System and Method for Triggering Actions at a Host Computer by Telephone,” on Sept. 15, 1998.
The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorney Peter J. Corcoran, III of the law firm Corcoran IP Law PLLC in Texarkana is representing Spycurity.