Southeast Texas News

Recent News About House

• 172nd Court District, Judge Floyd, Feb. 1-29

  By Carrie Gonzalez | Wednesday, Feb 13, 2008 @ 3:40pm

  172nd COURT DISTRICT

  ---

• New business licenses/assumed names issued in Jefferson County

  By Marilyn Tennissen | Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 @ 4:36am

  Orig. Filing Date: 12/05/2007 Certificate #: 71843

  ---

• 60th Court District, Judge Sanderson, Sept. 1-30

  By Carrie Gonzalez | Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 @ 2:38am

  60th COURT DISTRICT

  ---

• New business licenses/assumed names issued by the Jefferson County Clerk

  By Marilyn Tennissen | Thursday, Aug 9, 2007 @ 4:37am

  Orig. Filing Date: 08/01/2007 Certificate #: 71121

  ---

• New business licenses/assumed names issued by the Jefferson County Clerk, July 19-26, 2007

  By Marilyn Tennissen | Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 @ 3:58am

  Orig. Filing Date: 07/19/2007 Certificate #: 71042

  ---

• New business licenses/assumed names filed with Jefferson County Clerk, July 12-19

  By David Yates | Thursday, Jul 19, 2007 @ 7:00am

  Orig. Filing Date: 07/12/2007 Certificate #: 70988

  ---

• Recent business licenses/assumed names

  By Marilyn Tennissen | Thursday, Jul 12, 2007 @ 5:00am

  Recent business licenses/assumed names issued by the Jefferson County Clerk, July 1-12, 2007

  ---

• 60th Court District, Judge Sanderson, July 1-31

  By Carrie Gonzalez | Wednesday, Jun 27, 2007 @ 6:22am

  July 1 - 31, 2007

  ---

• 172nd Court District, Judge Floyd May 1 - 31

  By Carrie Gonzalez | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 @ 6:00am

  172nd COURT DISTRICT

  ---

• Texas court dismisses claim of VIOXX user who said Merck failed to properly warn of the alleged risks

  By The SE Texas Record | Sunday, Apr 22, 2007 @ 5:00am

  WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J., April 20, 2007 - Merck & Co., Inc. said today that a Texas court overseeing the Texas litigation rejected a plaintiff's claim that she was not properly informed of the medicine's alleged risks because, in fact, the VIOXX label contained a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved warning. The court order in the case, Ledbetter v. Merck, could have an impact on most

  ---