Quantcast

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Saturday, November 2, 2024

Seiu

Recent News About Seiu View More

  • Will the Janus Case Strike the Deathblow to Public Sector Unions?

    By Mark Pulliam |
    The Supreme Court will hear oral argument today [February 26] in one of the term’s most important—and highly publicized—cases, Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. As many readers are aware, the case involves the constitutionality of “agency shop” arrangements in public sector collective bargaining agreements, which compel non-member employees to make payments in lieu of union dues as a condition of their employment. Agency shop clauses are commonly used in public-sector labor contracts, enabling powerful unions representing teachers and other government employees to collect large sums of money from workers who never consented to such exactions (and who, for that matter, never voted in favor of union representation).

  • Selective Outrage

    By Mark Pulliam |
    Is Sen. Kamala Harris the victim of partisan politics, or its savvy practitioner and beneficiary?

  • Lone Star Lilliput

    By Mark Pulliam |
    Complacent Texas taxpayers have become captives of their rent-seeking civil servants.

  • SEIU headed for the trash heap?

    By The SE Texas Record |
    It's not nice to gloat, but sometimes you just can't help yourself.

  • Texas judge denies SEIU retrial, orders union to turn over documents

    By David Yates |
    HOUSTON – A Texas district judge recently ruled the Service Employees International Union has no grounds to request a retrial following a court order directing the Chicago-based union to pay Professional Janitorial Services Houston $7.8 million.

  • SEIU civil trial calls into question inner workings of labor union

    By David Yates |
    HOUSTON – Earlier this month, a Harris County jury ordered Service Employees International Union to pay Professional Janitorial Services - Houston $5.3 million in damages, finding the Chicago-based labor union made false claims about the company’s business practices and treatment of employees.