MARSHALL DIVISION
Feb. 6
Location Services IP, LLC v. Foursquare Labs, Inc. 2:15-cv-00152-JRG
Location Services IP, LLC v. Telenav, Inc. et al 2:15-cv-00153-JRG
Location Services IP, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al 2:15-cv-00154-JRG
Location Services IP, LLC v. Yahoo! 2:15-cv-00155-JRG
Plaintiff, Location Services IP, LLC, is a Texas company with its place of business in Dallas.
The plaintiff brings the patent infringement actions to stop defendants’ alleged infringement of U.S. patent Nos. 6,202,023; 5,839,088; 8,935,220; and 6,356,834.
The patents-in-Suit originated from Go2, a pioneer in location based services and mobile web technology. Lee Hancock, a visionary and inventor who is a named inventor on each of the patents-in-suit, founded Go2. Plaintiff is the current assignee of the patents-in-suit and has standing to bring this lawsuit, including the right to recover damages for past, present, and future infringement of the patents.
The plaintiff is represented by attorney John Edmonds of the Houston law firm Collins, Edmonds, Pogorzelski, Schlather & Tower.
Feb. 6
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. ADT LLC 2:15-cv-00156-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Belkin International, Inc. 2:15-cv-00157-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Brickhouse Electronics, LLC 2:15-cv-00158-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. 2:15-cv-00159-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. CPI Security, Inc. 2:15-cv-00160-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. General Electric Company 2:15-cv-00161-RWS-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC v. Honeywell International, Inc. 2:15-cv-00162-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Netgear, Inc. 2:15-cv-00163-JRG
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. OnStar, LLC 2:15-cv-00164-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America 2:15-cv-00165-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC et al 2:15-cv-00166-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Rain Bird Corporation 2:15-cv-00167-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation 2:15-cv-00168-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. TRANE U.S. INC. 2:15-cv-00169-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Tyco Integrated Security LLC 2:15-cv-00171-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Uniden America Corporation 2:15-cv-00172-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC v. Vivint, Inc. 2:15-cv-00173-JRG-RSP
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Westec Intelligent Surveillance, Inc. 2:15-cv-00174-JRG-RSP
Plaintiff is a Texas limited liability company with its principal office located in Plano.
Plaintiff Rothschild Connected Devices Innovation files the complaint against the defendants for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,788,090, titled “System and Method for Creating a Personalized Consumer Product.”
The plaintiff is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson and Bailey Hubbard of the Dallas law firm Brown Fox Kizzia & Johnson.
Tyler Division
Feb. 11
Verified Hiring, LLC v. SumTotal Systems LLC et al 6:15-cv-00113
Verified Hiring, LLC v. SuccessFactors Inc. et al 6:15-cv-00114
Verified Hiring, LLC v. HealthcareSource HR, Inc. 6:15-cv-00115
Verified Hiring, LLC v. CareerBuilder, LLC et al 6:15-cv-00116
Verified Hiring, LLC v. The Ultimate Software Group, Inc. 6:15-cv-00117
Verified Hiring, LLC v. Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. 6:15-cv-00118
Verified Hiring, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation 6:15-cv-00120
Plaintiff Verified Hiring, LLC is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.
The patent infringement actions seek to stop defendants’ alleged infringement of U.S. patent Nos. 6,658,400 and 5,592,375.
Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the ‘400 Patent entitled “Data Certification and Verification System Having a Multiple-User-Controlled Data Interface” –including all rights to recover for past and future acts of infringement. The ‘400 Patent issued on Dec. 2, 2003.
The ‘400 Patent relates to a computer-implemented system for managing access to, and the control exchange of, data within a multi-party data attribute management system, and for meeting a marketplace need for transforming data in a specifically defined manner, by having a data originator submit data having an attribute in “an unverified source state,” and then submitting that data to an attribute verifier that determines the truth or falsity of the data attribute, thereby changing and transforming the data into “a verified use state.”
The ‘375 Patent is entitled “Computer-Assisted System for Interactively Brokering Goods or Services Between Buyers and Sellers” and was issued Jan. 7, 1997.
The ‘375 Patent relates to a computer-implemented system for assisting an employer’s hiring decision from among various potential job applicants by using multimedia information descriptive of the potential candidates; database entries with controlled associations; a job applicant interface which allows users to interactively enter information, including multimedia information; an employer interface which allows employers to specify a description of combinations of job applicant information; matching desired employee requirements using approximate-comparison logic such as “want,” :must, and weighted logic requirements; and rank ordering based upon the closeness of the match of the desired employee.
Longview attorney Todd Brandt of Stevens Henry represents the plaintiff.
Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas
ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY
Total • Vision • Trane • Cisco Systems, Inc. • Adt Llc • U.S. Inc. • General Electric • Plano • Wal-Mart • Intel • Marshall • Panasonic Corporation