Quantcast

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Saturday, November 2, 2024

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

MARSHALL DIVISION

May 18

Super Interconnect Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al 2:15-cv-00773-JRG-RSP

Plaintiff is a Plano company

The civil action is for infringement of United States Patent No. 7,158,593, United States Patent No. 7,627,044, and United States Patent No. 6,463,092.

Patent No. 7,158,593 is entitled “Combining a Clock Signal and a Data Signal.” Patent No. 7,627,044 is entitled “Clock-Edge Modulated Serial Link with DC-Balance Control.” Patent No. 6,463,092 is entitled “System and Method for Sending and Receiving Data Signals Over a Clock Signal Line.”

The plaintiff is represented by the Houston firm Ahmad Zavitsanos Anaipakos Alavi & Mensing.

Graham Springs LLC v. Zenfolio Inc. 2:15-cv-00774-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Zazzle Inc. 2:15-cv-00775-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. XO Group Inc. 2:15-cv-00776-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Cimpress USA, Incorporated d/b/a Vistaprint 2:15-cv-00778-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Logo Sportswear Inc. 2:15-cv-00779-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Uberprints Inc. 2:15-cv-00780-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Michaels Stores, Inc. 2:15-cv-00781-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Things Remembered, Inc. 2:15-cv-00782-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Minted, LLC 2:15-cv-00783-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Teespring, Inc. 2:15-cv-00785-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Moo Inc. 2:15-cv-00786-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Smugmug, Inc. 2:15-cv-00787-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Shutterfly, Inc. 2:15-cv-00788-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Deluxe Small Business Sales, Inc. d/b/a PsPrint 2:15-cv-00789-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Picaboo Corporation 2:15-cv-00791-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Personalizationmall.com, Inc. 2:15-cv-00792-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Provide Commerce, Inc. 2:15-cv-00793-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Party City Corporation 2:15-cv-00794-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Miller's, Inc. d/b/a mpix.com 2:15-cv-00795-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Schurman Fine Papers 2:15-cv-00797-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. ooShirts, Inc. 2:15-cv-00798-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Overnight Prints, Inc. 2:15-cv-00799-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Checks in the Mail, Inc. d/b/a iPrint.com 2:15-cv-00800-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. District Photo, Inc. d/b/a InkGarden.com 2:15-cv-00801-JRG-RSP

Graham Springs LLC v. Digital Room, Inc. 2:15-cv-00802-JRG-RSP

Plaintiff is a Plano company.

The actions for patent infringement allege infringement of United States Patent No. 5,524,085, entitled “Multimedia Job Tickets for Printing Machines.”

The Dallas firm Austin Hansley represents the plaintiff.

Xanthus Data Technologies, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation 2:15-cv-00777-JRG

Plaintiff is an Allen company.

Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the valid and enforceable United States Patent No. 5,999,947 (“the ‘947 Patent”) entitled “Distributing Database Differences Corresponding to Database Change Events Made to a Database Table Located On a Server Computer” – including all rights to recover for past and future acts of infringement.

Plaintiff is also the owner by assignment of the valid and enforceable United States Patent No. 6,321,236 (“the ‘236 Patent”) entitled “Distributing Database Differences Corresponding to Database Change Events Made to a Database Table Located On a Server Computer.”

Frisco attorney Ronald Burns represents the plaintiff.

May 19

Fellowship Filtering Technologies, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al 2:15-cv-00805-JRG

Plaintiff Fellowship Filtering Technologies alleges infringement of patent of U.S. Patent No. 5,884,282.

The ‘282 patent discloses how interactions with the Internet are manipulated to yield a desired result—a result that overrides the routine and conventional sequence of events ordinarily triggered by requesting content or a product that is relevant to a user of a website.

The plaintiff is represented by the Gladewater law firm Capshaw Derieux.

May 22

eDekka LLC v. Superbiiz, Inc. 2:15-cv-00811-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Sweetwater Sound, Inc. 2:15-cv-00812-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Encore Holdings, LLC d/b/a Tech for Less, Inc. 2:15-cv-00813

eDekka LLC v. TGIB Marketing, Inc. 2:15-cv-00814

eDekka LLC v. The Burton Corporation 2:15-cv-00816

Plaintiff is a Plano company.

The patent infringement actions seek to stop Defendants’ infringement of United

States Patent No. 6,266,674 (“the ‘674 patent”) entitled “Random Access Information Retrieval Utilizing User-Defined Labels.”

Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief.

Dallas attorney Austin Hansley represents the plaintiff.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News