SE Texas Record

Saturday, October 19, 2019

TDCJ on trial for discriminating against white employee

By David Yates | Oct 28, 2009


The Texas Department of Criminal Justice is on trial this week for allegedly discriminating against a pair of past employees, who allege TDCJ supervisors retaliated against them for "blowing the whistle" on illegal activities.

Claiming she was threatened with termination if she disciplined a black subordinate, Bonnie Young, a white woman, felt her supervisor was purposely putting her between a rock and hard place so she could eventually be replaced by an African American.

On Wednesday, Oct. 28, Young testified that her TDCJ supervisors retaliated against her for reprimanding a black male employee, whom she alleges was using the inmates to build personal items for him.

She also testified that her supervisor told her to "back down" from the matter, but she refused.

When her position was finally taken from her, Young filed a suit against her former employer, the TDCJ. Young's suit was filed Feb. 17, 2006, in Jefferson County District Court.

Court documents show that in the fall of 2003, TDCJ transferred Young to the Mark W. Stiles Prison Unit as an assistant warden to work under the direct supervision of then Senior Warden David Doughty.

In addition to other duties, Doughty assigned Young to assist in overseeing the prison's kennel and horse operations.

Her duties included supervision of the kennel sergeant, David Conley. Michael Simmons, another TDCJ officer, was Conley's assistant kennelman. Young contends that in March 2005, TDCJ's discriminatory treatment led to her transfer from the Stiles Unit to another prison.

According to court documents, Young filed a charge of discrimination on June 7, 2005, with the Texas Workforce Commission-Civil Rights Division, alleging Doughty removed her from her position based on her gender and race.

She also asserted that Doughty threatened to retaliate against her if she disciplined Conley, whom Young alleged made unfounded sexist and racist remarks about her with Doughty's consent.

Based on Conley's unfounded allegations, according to Young's testimony, Doughty wrongfully took disciplinary actions against her, ultimately resulting in her transfer to a less desirable position at another prison.

Young's charging documents also state that the harassment increased following her refusal to comply with Doughty's instructions on how to respond to an internal departmental investigation.

According to Young, soon after she began supervising Conley, he began making threatening remarks about Young to Simmons, which Simmons reported. Despite Doughty's instruction that she not discipline Conley, Young issued Conley several reprimands based on his poor work performance and TDCJ policy infractions.

Then, in November of 2004, Conley filed a discrimination complaint against Young. Conley alleged that Young allowed another correctional officer to make racist remarks in his presence. Conley also alleged that Simmons and Young were engaged in a sexual relationship. An investigation failed to substantiate Conley's complaints.

Doughty met with Young and Simmons and told them that he did not allow such relationships. Doughty subsequently modified Young's job duties so that she no longer had supervisory responsibilities over the prison's kennel or field operations. Young responded by writing Doughty, complaining about Conley spreading false information about her relationship with Simmons and objecting to the modifications that Doughty made to her job, court papers say.

Simmons is also a plaintiff in the suit.

The plaintiffs are asking jurors to award them damages for lost wages and mental anguish.

The suit also names Mosely, Conley and Doughty as defendants.

Alleging the defendants acted with malice, Young and Simmons are also suing for punitive and compensatory damages.

Judge Bob Wortham, 58th District Court, is presiding over the trial.

They are represented by attorney John Morgan of the Lindsay & Morgan law firm.

TDCJ is represented in part by attorneys Allan K. Cook and Phillip E. Marrus.

Case No. A176-511

Want to get notified whenever we write about ?

Sign-up Next time we write about , we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

More News