Marshall Division

Dec. 30

  • Allergan Inc. v. Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.

    Allergan is a corporation with a principal place of business in Irvine, Calif. Allergan operates a facility in Waco, Texas, where it manufactures and distributes numerous pharmaceutical products, including Acular LS.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,008,338 issued Aug. 30, 2011, for Ketorolac Tromethamine Compositions For Treating Or Preventing Ocular Pain.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest, attorney's fees and court costs.

    Allergan is represented by Wesley Hill of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview and W. Chad Shear of Fish & Richardson P.C. in Wilmington, Del.

    A jury trial is requested.

    Case No. 2:11-cv-00530

    Tyler Division

    Dec. 29

  • Cell and Network Selection v. AT&T Inc. et al.

    CNS is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Frisco.

    The defendants are A T&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, HT Corporation and HTC America Inc.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,195,551 issued Feb. 27, 2001, for Idle Handoff Controlling Method in Cellular Communication System.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction and for an award of damages, treble damages, court costs and interest.

    CNS is represented by Andrew DiNovo of DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy in Austin.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00706

  • Accuhale v. AstraZeneca LP et al.

    Accuhale is a Texas limited liability company with its principal place of business in Frisco.

    The defendants are AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca Dunkerque Production SCS, AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca PLC.

    The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,718,355 issued Feb. 17, 1998, for an Indicator Device Responsive to Axial Force for use with Inhaler.

    Accuhale is asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, royalty, interest, court costs and attorney's fees.

    The plaintiff is represented by Jonathan T. Suder, Brett Pinkus and Todd I. Blumenfeld of Friedman, Suder & Cooke in Fort Worth.

    A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00707

    Dec. 30

  • Landmark Technology v. Hibbett Sports Inc.

    Landmark Technology is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Tyler.

    The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 issued Nov. 19, 1996, for Automated Sales and Services System and U.S. Patent No. 6,289,319 issued Sept. 11, 2001, for Automated Business and Financial Transaction Processing System; and U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 issued March 7, 2006, for Automated Multimedia Data Processing Network.

    The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, reasonably royalty or lost profits, enhanced damages, court costs, attorney's fees and interest.

    Landmark Technology is represented by Charles Ainsworth and Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth P.C. in Tyler and Stanley M. Gibson and Gregory S. Cordey of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP of Los Angeles, Calif. A jury trial is requested.

    U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis is assigned to the case.

    Case No. 6:11-cv-00709

  • More News