MARSHALL DIVISION
Sept. 16
• Harcol Research v. 6S Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00709
• Harcol Research v. Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00710
• Harcol Research v. Black Market Distribution Case No. 2:13-cv-00711
• Harcol Research v. BNC Nutrition Case No. 2:13-cv-00712
• Harcol Research v. Cytosport Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00713
• Harcol Research v. Evogen Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00714
• Harcol Research v. Exclusive Supplements Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00715
• Harcol Research v. Force Factor Case No. 2:13-cv-00716
• Harcol Research v. HBS International Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00717
• Harcol Research v. Joe Wells Enterprises Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00718
• Harcol Research v. LiveLong Nutrition Case No. 2:13-cv-00719
• Harcol Research v. Magnum Nutraceuticals Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00720
• Harcol Research v. Muscle Sports Products Case No. 2:13-cv-00721
• Harcol Research v. Natrol Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00722
• Harcol Research v. New Whey Nutrition Case No. 2:13-cv-00723
• Harcol Research v. Nitro Sports Supplements Case No. 2:13-cv-00724
• Harcol Research v. Nutrex Research Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00725
• Harcol Research v. Power Performance Products Case No. 2:13-cv-00726
• Harcol Research v. SAN Nutrition Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00727
• Harcol Research v. Science Defined Nutrition Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00728
• Harcol Research v. Scivation Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00729
• Harcol Research v. Ultimate Nutrition Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00730
• Harcol Research v. Universal Nutrition Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00731
Plaintiff is a Nevada limited liability company organized with a principal place of business in Tyler.
The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,817,364 issued for Beverage Containing Alpha-Ketoglutaric Acid and Method of Making.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of gains, profits, advantages, treble damages, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, interest and court costs.
Harcol Research is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Firm PC in Longview. A jury trial is requested.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.
• CYVA Research Holdings v. Priceline.com Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00732
CYVA is a Texas limited liability company, with a principal place of business in Plano.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,987,440 issued on Nov. 16, 1999, for Personal Information Security and Exchange Tool and U.S. Patent No. 8,195,569 issued June 5, 2012, for E-bazaar Featuring Personal Information Security.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, costs, expenses and interest.
CYVA is represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.
Sept. 17
• C4cast.com Inc. v. The New York Times Co. Case No. 2:13-cv-00733
• C4cast.com Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00736
• C4cast.com Inc. v. Time Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00737
• C4cast.com Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co. Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00738
• C4cast.com Inc. v. Gametap Case No. 2:13-cv-00739
C4cast.com is a Delaware corporation having a principal place of business in Pasadena, Calif.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,958,204 issued June 7, 2011, for Community-Selected Content.
The plaintiffs are asking the court to issue an injunction to prevent further infringement and for an award of damages, costs, expenses and interest.
C4cast.com is represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas. A jury trial is requested.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.
• Quality Night Lights LLC v. Amplic USA Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00734
• Quality Night Lights LLC v. L & V Creations Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00735
Quality Night Lights is a limited liability company with a place of business in Longview.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,390,647 issued May 21, 2002, for Night Light and U.S. Patent No. 7,874,717, issued Jan. 25, 2011, for Night Light.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, compensatory damages, interest and court costs.
Quality Night Lights is represented by Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Longview; James A. Fussell III of Spangler & Fussell P.C. in Alexandria, Va.; and Tyler J. Woods of Newport Trial Group in Newport Beach, Calif.
A jury trial is requested.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.
• Arczar et al v. Harmon International Industries Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00740
• Arczar et al v. WowWee USA Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00741
Arczar is a Texas limited liability company having a principal place of business in Marshall. Plaintiff Geovector is a California corporation having a principle place in San Francisco.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,037,936 issued March 14, 2000, for Computer Vision System with a Graphic User Interface and Remote Camera Control.
The plaintiffs are seeking an award of damages, expenses, court costs, interest and attorney’s fees.
Arczar and Geovector are represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas.
A jury trial is requested.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.
Sept. 18
• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Summer Infant Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-00742
• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Uniden America Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00743
Sept. 20
• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. Exclusive Group d/b/a Binatone North America et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00746
• Telinit Technologies Inc. v. FLIR Systems Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-00747
Telinit is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Plano.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,016,942 issued March 21, 2006, for Dynamic Hosting.
The plaintiff is asking the court to enjoin the defendants from further infringement and for an award of damages, enhanced damages, interest, court costs and attorney’s fees.
Telinit is represented by William E. Davis III of The Davis Firm PC in Longview and Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola of Ferraiuoli LLC in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
A jury trial is requested.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.
TYLER DIVISION
Sept. 20
• Catharon Intellectual Property v. Adobe Systems Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00689
• Catharon Intellectual Property v. International Business Machines Case No. 6:13-cv-00690
• Catharon Intellectual Property v. Microsoft Corp. Case No. 6:13-cv-00691
• Catharon Intellectual Property v. Zynga Inc. Case No. 6:13-cv-00692
Catharon is a Texas limited liability company, with its principal place of business located in Austin.
The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,065,046 issued May 16, 2000, for Computerized System and Associated Method of Optimally Controlled Storage and Transfer of Computer Programs on a Computer Network.
The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, expenses, court costs and interest.
Catharon is represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas.