MARSHALL DIVISION

Dec. 3 

• Concinnitas et al v. Sprint Nextel Corp. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-01049

• Concinnitas et al v. Franklin Wireless Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01050

• Concinnitas et al v. Huawei Device USA Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01051

• Concinnitas et al v. Novatel Wireless Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01052

• Concinnitas et al v. ZTE (USA) Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01053

Concinnitas is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the state of Texas with a principle place of business in Marshall. Plaintiff George W. Hindman is an individual residing within the state of Texas.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,805,542 issued Sept. 28, 2010, for Mobile United Attached in a Mobile Environment That Fully Restricts Access to Data Received via Wireless Signal to a Separate Computer in the Mobile Environment.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, court costs, interest and attorney’s fees.

Concinnitas is represented by Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang, Neal G. Massand and Stevenson Moore V of Ni, Wang & Associates PLLC in Dallas.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the cases.

 

• Quality Experience Testing v. JDS Uniphase Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-01054

Quality Experience Testing is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Longview.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,596,373 issued for Sept. 29, 2009, for Method and System For Quality of Service Monitoring for Wireless Devices.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

Quality Experience is represented by Stephen F. Schlather of Collins, Edmonds, Pogorzelski, Schalther & Tower PLLC in Houston and  Andrew Spangler of Spangler Law P.C. in Longview.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

• MXGO Technologies Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-01055

MXGO has a place of business in California.

The defendant is accused of infringing on:

• U.S. Patent No. 7,546,351 issued June 9, 2009, for Methods and Systems for Filtering, Sorting, and Dispatching Messages to Wired and Wireless Devices; and

• U.S. Patent No. 6,779,022 issued Aug. 17, 2004 for Server that Obtains Information from Multiple Sources, Filters Using Client Identities and Dispatches to Both Hardwired and Wireless Clients.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, court costs and interest.

MXGO is represented by Stephen F. Schlather and John J. Edmonds of Collins, Edmonds, Pogorzelski, Schlather & Tower PLLC in Houston.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap is assigned to the case.

 

Dec. 5

• NFC Technology v. HTC America Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-01058

NFC Technology is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business Marshall.

The defendant is accused of infringing on:

• U.S. patent No. 7,665,664 issued Feb. 23, 2010, for Inductive Coupling Reader Comprising Means for Extracting A Power Supply Voltage; and

• U.S. patent No. 6,700,551 issued March 2, 2004 for Antenna Signal Amplitude Modulation Method.

NFC Technology is seeking an award of actual damages, enhanced damages, interest, attorney’s fees, and court costs.

A jury trial is requested.

The plaintiffs are represented by Sam Baxter, Jennifer Truelove of McKool Smith PC in Marshalll and Robert Auchter, Benjamin Levi, Jeffrey Frey and Brandon Jordan of McKool Smith P.C. in Washington, D.C.

 

Dec. 6

• Solocron Media v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al Case No. 2:13-cv-01059

Solocron is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Tyler.

The defendant is accused of infringing on:

• U.S. Patent No. 6,496,692 B1 issued on Dec. 17, 2002, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices;

• U.S. Patent No. 7,257,395 B2 issued Aug. 14, 2007, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices;

• U.S. Patent No. 7,295,864 B2 issued Nov. 13, 2007, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices;

• U.S. Patent No. 7,319,866 B2 issued Jan. 15, 2008, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices;

• U.S. Patent No. 7,742,759 B2  issued June 22, 2010, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices;

• U.S. Patent No. 8,249,572 B2 issued Aug. 21, 2012, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices; and

• U.S. Patent No. 8,594,651 B2 issued Nov. 26, 2013, for Methods and Apparatuses for Programming User-Defined Information Into Electronic Devices.

The plaintiff is asking the court for an injunction and for an award of damages, court costs, expenses and interest.

Solocron is represented by Eric H. Findlay of Findlay Craft LLP in Tyler and Matthew D. Powers, Steven S. Cherensky, Paul T. Ehrlich, William P. Nelson and Robert L. Gerrity of Tensegrity Law Group LLP in Redwood Shores, Calif.

A jury trial is requested.

 

SHERMAN DIVISION

Dec. 5

• McCain v. Lord Corp. Case No. 4:13-cv-00721

Plaintiff Joseph H. McCain is an inventor and a resident of the state of Texas.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 8,373,559 issued Feb. 12, 2013, for Microelectronic Device with Integrated Energy Source.

The plaintiff is seeking an award of damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

McCain is represented by Glenn E. Janik of The Janik Law Firm PLLC in Dallas.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Richard A. Schell is assigned to the case.

 

TYLER DIVISION

Dec. 3

• JumpSport Inc. v. Springfree LP et al Case No. 6:13-cv-00929

JumpSport Inc. is a corporation formed in California with a principal place in San Jose.

The defendant is accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,053,845 and U.S. Patent No. 6,261,207, both issued for Trampoline or the Like with Enclosure.

The plaintiff is asking the Court to enjoin the defendant from further infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest, attorney’s fees and court costs.

JumpSport is Cabrach J. Connor and David E. Dunham of Taylor Dunham LLP in Austin.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge John D. Love is assigned to the case.

More News