MARSHALL DIVISION
Jan. 25
Numic Technology, LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc. 2:16-cv-00078-RWS
Numic Technology, LLC v. Blu Products, Inc. 2:16-cv-00079-RWS
Numic Technology, LLC v. Sonim Technologies, Inc. 2:16-cv-00080-RWS
Numic Technology, LLC v. TCT Mobile (US) Inc. d/b/a Alcatel One Touch et al 2:16-cv-00081-RWS
The plaintiff Numic is based in Allen.
It has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of eight patents: United States Patent Numbers 5,666,159; 5,969,698; 5,943,603; 6,600,510; 6,731,952; RE41,542; 7,952,616; and 8,736,694.
Numic seeks unspecified monetary damages, and is represented by attorneys Daniel J. Chalker and Edwin S. Flores of the law firm Chalker Flores, LLP in Dallas.
Jan. 27
Entry Systems, LLC v. Alarm Security Group, LLC d/b/a ASG Security 2:16-cv-00087
Entry Systems, LLC v. Brivo Inc. 2:16-cv-00088
Entry Systems, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC 2:16-cv-00089
Frisco-based Entry Systems claims ownership of U.S. Patent No. 6,161,005 (“the ‘005 patent”) entitled “Door Locking/Unlocking System Utilizing Direct and Network Communications”.
The ‘005 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 12, 2000, according to Entry Systems’ court documents.
The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorney Austin Hansley of the law firm Austin Hansley, P.L.L.C. in Dallas.
Jan. 29
Meraloc, LLC v. Apple Inc. 2:16-cv-00090
Meraloc, LLC v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. 2:16-cv-00091
Meraloc, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al 2:16-cv-00092
Meraloc, LLC v. Timex Group USA, Inc. 2:16-cv-00093
Meraloc, LLC v. VOXX International Corporation et al 2:16-cv-00094
According to its complaint, plaintiff Meraloc seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial for what it perceives is infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,451,262.
It is represented by attorneys Eugenio J. Torres-Oyola and Jean G. Vidal Font of the law firm Ferraiuoli LLC in San Juan, P.R.