Quantcast

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Thursday, March 28, 2024

Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

General court 09

shutterstock.com

MARSHALL DIVISION

July 11

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. APMEX, Inc. 2:16-cv-00747-JRG-RSP

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp. 2:16-cv-00748-JRG-RSP

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Musician's Friend, Inc. 2:16-cv-00749-JRG-RSP

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc. 2:16-cv-00750-JRG-RSP

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Saks Incorporated 2:16-cv-00751-JRG-RSP

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. 2:16-cv-00752-JRG-RSP

The plaintiff Lexos Media is based in Plano.

It has pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement of United States Patent Numbers 5,995,102; 6,118,449; and 7,111,254.

The ‘102 and the ‘449 patents, are both entitled “Server system and method for modifying a cursor image” while the ‘254 patent is called “System for replacing a cursor image in connection with displaying the contents of a web page.”

Lexos Media seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

Attorneys Eric W. Buether, Christopher M. Joe, and Kenneth P. Kula of the law firm Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC in Dallas is representing the complainant.

July 12

Somaltus, LLC v. ASUS Computer International 2:16-cv-00757-JRG-RSP

Somaltus, LLC v. Lenovo Group, Ltd. et al 2:16-cv-00759-JRG-RSP

Somaltus, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al 2:16-cv-00760-JRG-RSP

Somaltus, LLC v. Sony Corporation of America 2:16-cv-00761-JRG-RSP

Somaltus, LLC v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 2:16-cv-00763-JRG-RSP

Plano-based Somaltus is the plaintiff.

The company seeks to stop what it perceives is infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,657,386, titled “Integrated Battery Service System.”

“The plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the ‘386 patent with sole rights to enforce the ‘386 patent and sue infringers,” court documents say.

Somaltus seeks unspecified monetary damages.

It is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson, D. Bradley Kizzia, and Anthony Ricciardelli of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas.

Computer Tracking Systems LLC v. Churchill Downs, Inc. 2:16-cv-00762-RWS-RSP

Computer Tracking Systems LLC v. Huuuge, Inc. 2:16-cv-00764-RWS-RSP

Computer Tracking Systems LLC v. Midwest Gaming and Entertainment, LLC 2:16-cv-00765-RWS-RSP

Computer Tracking Systems LLC v. Morris Mohawk Gaming Group et al 2:16-cv-00766-RWS-RSP

Computer Tracking Systems LLC v. Penn National Gaming, Inc. 2:16-cv-00767-RWS-RSP

The plaintiff Computer Tracking asserts ownership of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,872,138 and 6,666,768.

Per court papers, the ‘138 patent and the ‘768 patent, both are entitled “System and Method for Tracking Game of Chance Proceeds” and associated with inventions that resolve technical problems related to computer user activity tracking systems.

Computer Tracking seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

It is represented by attorneys Robert Kiddie, Dolly Wu, and Timothy Devlin of the Devlin Law Firm LLC in Wilmington, Del.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News