MMG IP Management LLC v. Linkedin Corporation 2:16-cv-00938-JRG
MMG IP Management LLC et al v Microsoft Corporation 2:16-cv-00939-JRG
MMG IP Management LLC v. Data.Com Connect, Inc 2:16-cv-00940-JRG
The plaintiff MMG is based in Plano.
It is pursuing legal action as a result of what it asserts
was infringement of United States Patent Number 8,321,459.
Recent court documents show that the ‘459 patent, entitled “Method and System for Facilitating
Access to Always Current Contact Information,” was issued on Nov. 27, 2012.
They purportedly list MMG owner Peter Pekarek-Kostka as the inventor.
“The ‘459 patent covers the methods and systems invented by
MMG’s Peter Pekarek-Kostka, and protects MMG’s exclusive right to sell its
methods and systems without infringement by competitors or their products,” the
original petition says.
“With MMG’s covered methods and systems, as long as the
owner of the contact information updates his or her records in a storage
location, all third party contact information collections are also kept up to
date and users benefit from the most accurate and current contact information
MMG seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorney Stephen M. Lobbin of the law firm One LLP in Newport
Beach, Calif. serves as the plaintiff’s legal counsel.
Cypaleo, LLC v. Avaya Inc. 2:16-cv-00945-JRG-RSP
Cypaleo, LLC v. Grandstream Networks, Inc.
Cypaleo, LLC v. Polycom, Inc. 2:16-cv-00948-JRG-RSP
Cypaleo, LLC v. Snom, Inc. 2:16-cv-00949-JRG-RSP
Plano-based Cypaleo is the plaintiff.
It claims that U.S. Patent No. 5,638,427, entitled “Operator-controlled
Interactive Communication Device,” was infringed upon.
Per its complaint, Cypaleo is the subject patent’s owner by
assignment and reserves the right to sue infringers.
The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages.
It is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson and D. Bradley
Kizzia of the law firm Kizza Johnson PLLC in Dallas.
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Giesecke & Devrient America, Inc. 2:16-cv-00950-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Addonics Technologies, Inc. 2:16-cv-00951-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Fortinet, Inc. 2:16-cv-00952-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Gemalto, Inc. 2:16-cv-00953-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. HID Global Corporation 2:16-cv-00954-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Yubico, Inc. 2:16-cv-00955-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Chunghwa Telecom Global, Inc. 2:16-cv-00956-JRG-RSP
Vortex Pathway LLC v. Goldkey Corporation 2:16-cv-00957-JRG-RSP
The plaintiff Vortex is based in Austin.
It asserts ownership of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,635 and has
pursued legal action in response to alleged infringement. David C. Reardon is
the purported inventor of the ‘635 patent, which was issued Apr. 3, 2001.
The subject patent, entitled “Network Security System
Allowing Access and Modification to a Security Subsystem After Initial
Installation When a Master Token is in Place,” relates to a method and system
for providing security for a computer by implementing an additional level of
user control over a computer through a security gateway that is positioned
upstream of the computer's CPU, according to recent court papers.
Vortex seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorneys Joel B. Rothman and Jerald I. Schneider of the law
firm Schneider Rothman Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC in Boca Raton, Fla.
and Kenneth P. Kula of the law firm Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC in Dallas.