MARSHALL DIVISION
Oct. 4
SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. BINDO LABS, INC. 2:16-cv-01077-JRG-RSP
SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. ICONNECT 2:16-cv-01078-JRG-RSP
SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. LIGHTSPEED 2:16-cv-01079-JRG-RSP
SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. MICROBIZ LLC 2:16-cv-01080-JRG-RSP
SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. SMARTOSC CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01081-JRG-RSP
The plaintiff STI is based in Dallas.
It asserts ownership of United States Patent Number 9,053,498, which is entitled “System and Method for Network Operation.” According to the complainant, the ‘498 patent was infringed upon.
STI seeks unspecified monetary damages.
Attorneys Jay Johnson and D. Bradley Kizzia of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas are representing the plaintiff.
SILKEEN LLC V. COOPER-ATKINS CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01082-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. GRID CONNECT, INC. 2:16-cv-01084-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. L-COM, INC. 2:16-cv-01085-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. MEASUREMENT COMPUTING CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01086-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. MESA MONITORING, INC. 2:16-cv-01087-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. MONNIT CORP. 2:16-cv-01088-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. OMEGA ENGINEERING INC. 2:16-cv-01089-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01090-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. PRIMEX WIRELESS, INC. 2:16-cv-01091-JRG
SILKEEN LLC V. TEMPALERT 2:16-cv-01092-JRG
The plaintiff Silkeen is based in Plano.
Claiming ownership of U.S. Patent No. 7,944,469, it is pursuing legal action over what it asserts was infringement.
Silkeen seeks unspecified monetary damages.
It is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson and D. Bradley Kizzia of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas.
TEXARKANA DIVISION
WETRO LAN LLC V. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 5:16-cv-00152-RWS
WETRO LAN LLC V. COMODO SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. 5:16-cv-00153-RWS
WETRO LAN LLC V. FORTINET, INC. 5:16-cv-00154-RWS
WETRO LAN LLC V. KASPERSKY LAB, INC. 5:16-cv-00155-RWS
WETRO LAN LLC V. PANDA DISTRIBUTION, INC. 5:16-cv-00156-RWS
Plano-based Wetro Lan is the plaintiff.
It is pursuing legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,795,918. According to recent court documents, the ‘918 patent, entitled “Service Level Computer Security,” was issued on Sept. 21, 2004.
Wetro Lan seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
Attorney Peter J. Corcoran, III of the law firm Corcoran IP Law, PLLC in Texarkana is representing the complainant.