MARSHALL DIVISION

Oct. 4

SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. BINDO LABS, INC. 2:16-cv-01077-JRG-RSP

SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. ICONNECT 2:16-cv-01078-JRG-RSP        

SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. LIGHTSPEED 2:16-cv-01079-JRG-RSP

SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. MICROBIZ LLC 2:16-cv-01080-JRG-RSP

SCANNING TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS, LLC V. SMARTOSC CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01081-JRG-RSP  

The plaintiff STI is based in Dallas.

It asserts ownership of United States Patent Number 9,053,498, which is entitled “System and Method for Network Operation.” According to the complainant, the ‘498 patent was infringed upon.

STI seeks unspecified monetary damages.

Attorneys Jay Johnson and D. Bradley Kizzia of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas are representing the plaintiff.

SILKEEN LLC V. COOPER-ATKINS CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01082-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. GRID CONNECT, INC. 2:16-cv-01084-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. L-COM, INC. 2:16-cv-01085-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. MEASUREMENT COMPUTING CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01086-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. MESA MONITORING, INC. 2:16-cv-01087-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. MONNIT CORP. 2:16-cv-01088-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. OMEGA ENGINEERING INC.  2:16-cv-01089-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION 2:16-cv-01090-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. PRIMEX WIRELESS, INC. 2:16-cv-01091-JRG

SILKEEN LLC V. TEMPALERT 2:16-cv-01092-JRG

The plaintiff Silkeen is based in Plano.

Claiming ownership of U.S. Patent No. 7,944,469, it is pursuing legal action over what it asserts was infringement.

Silkeen seeks unspecified monetary damages.

It is represented by attorneys Jay Johnson and D. Bradley Kizzia of the law firm Kizzia Johnson, PLLC in Dallas.

TEXARKANA DIVISION

WETRO LAN LLC V. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 5:16-cv-00152-RWS

WETRO LAN LLC V. COMODO SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. 5:16-cv-00153-RWS

WETRO LAN LLC V. FORTINET, INC. 5:16-cv-00154-RWS

WETRO LAN LLC V. KASPERSKY LAB, INC. 5:16-cv-00155-RWS

WETRO LAN LLC V. PANDA DISTRIBUTION, INC. 5:16-cv-00156-RWS

Plano-based Wetro Lan is the plaintiff.

It is pursuing legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,795,918. According to recent court documents, the ‘918 patent, entitled “Service Level Computer Security,” was issued on Sept. 21, 2004.

Wetro Lan seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.

Attorney Peter J. Corcoran, III of the law firm Corcoran IP Law, PLLC in Texarkana is representing the complainant.

Want to get notified whenever we write about Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas ?
Next time we write about Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas

More News