HOUSTON – Three firms that represented plaintiffs in nearly
seven years of BP PLC securities litigation that included three cases and ended
in a $175 million settlement have asked a federal court to award a total of
$20.25 million, or 11.57 percent of the settlement fund, in fees in connection
with their work.
According to the fee payment motion filed on Jan. 9 in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Cohen Milstein Sellers
& Toll PC and Berman DeValerio served as court appointed co-lead class
counsel, and Block & Leviton LLP served as counsel to lead plaintiff the
Ohio Public Employees System (OPERS) in BP securities litigation.
In addition to the $20.25 million in total fees being
requested by those firms, the motion said lead counsel, co-lead plaintiff the
New York State Common Retirement System and OPERS statutory litigation counsel
at the Ohio Attorney General’s office, have asked the court to order reimbursement
of $2.74 million in expenses related to prosecution of the litigation.
The attorneys for the Ludlow plaintiffs are also seeking
reimbursement of $1.31 million in expenses tied to the prosecution of
post-explosion class claims, for a total of $4.05 million in expense
“After almost seven years of hard fought-litigation
involving multiple motions to dismiss and motions for class certification,
reviewing more than 1.4 million pages of documents, submitting and responding
to 18 different expert reports, taking and defending 22 merits and expert
depositions, defending an appeal before the 5th Circuit, briefing and arguing
a motion for summary judgment and briefing Daubert challenges to their experts’
testimony, lead counsel now seek an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses,” the
The attorneys said the fee request corresponds with a fee
deal reached with the lead plaintiffs before the litigation began. According to
the motion, the amount requested is more than reasonable, as 5th Circuit
district courts “routinely award as much as 25-30 percent of the common fund,
even where the litigation has not even reached the discovery phase.”
The three cases filed against BP were Thomas Yuen, v. BP PLC, Robert Ludlow v. BP PLC and Johnson Investment Counsel Inc. v. BP PLC.
These cases were transferred by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation to the Southern Texas District from the Western District of
Louisiana and Central District of California on Aug. 10, 2010.
According to court documents, the three actions allege
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, claiming that “BP and its
executives misled the investing public concerning the company’s safety measures
and commitment to conducting safe operations.”
Also, a derivative action was filed by BP stockholders on
Feb. 4, 2011. Those shareholders included Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’
Retirement System, city of New Orleans Employees’ Retirement System and John P.
The shareholders said investigation reports, hearing
testimony and oil spill discovery their attorneys reviewed as a basis for the
derivative action showed, among other findings, that BP “has not provided
effective process safety leadership and has not adequately established process
safety as a core value.”