First Harvey suit sneaks by new insurance law, seeks up to $1M in damages and 18 percent interest

By David Yates | Sep 5, 2017

DALLAS – Even while Hurricane Harvey continued to dump records amount of rain on Houstonians, Texas trial lawyers publicly preached doomsday for insureds was rapidly approaching – warning victims to file their claims before a new law went into effect.


DALLAS – Even while Hurricane Harvey continued to dump records amount of rain on Houstonians, Texas trial lawyers publicly preached doomsday for insureds was rapidly approaching – warning victims to file their claims before a new law went into effect.

House Bill 1774, crafted to end weather-related lawsuit abuse, became law on Sept. 1, ensuring insurance companies have 60 days to resolve claims to avoid litigation. The law also caps interest penalties at 10 percent and impacts recoverable attorney’s fees.

Prior to the new law, if a court found an insurer unlawfully delayed or denied payment, an 18 percent penalty could be assessed.

Just beating the deadline, Sunbelt Trees filed suit against Employers Mutual Casualty Company on Aug. 31 in Dallas County, seeking up to $1 million in damages for damages caused by Harvey.

Harvey made landfall on Aug. 25 and lingered along Texas coastlines for a week.

Sunbelt Trees claims its property was substantially damaged “around the time of the Hurricane.”

“Plaintiff has filed its claim with its insured, the Defendants insurance companies, but, as of the date of the commencement of this action, Defendants have not yet acknowledged liability and/or paid on the claim,” the suit states.

“All conditions precedent to Plaintiff’s claims have occurred, been satisfied and/or waived.”

While the suit fails to go into specific detail, the litigation describes Employers Mutual Casualty’s alleged conduct as “grossly negligent, intentional, willful, wanton, malicious” and “done recklessly, done with malice, and done with disregard for the rights of Sunbelt Trees.”  

In addition to actual, punitive, exemplary and mental anguish damages, Sunbelt Trees also “prays for prejudgment and post-judgment interest at the highest legal rate allowable by law between said parties and/or pursuant to the insurance code up to eighteen percent (18%).”

Had the suit been filed a day later, the highest legal rate allowable by law would have been 10 percent.

The company is also seeking attorney’s fees from Employers Mutual Casualty.

Dallas attorney Joseph Ackels Sr. of Ackels & Ackels represents Sunbelt Trees.

Cause No. Dc-17-11309

Want to get notified whenever we write about any of these organizations ?

Sign-up Next time we write about any of these organizations, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Dallas County Texans for Lawsuit Reform

More News

The Record Network