Quantcast

Federal judge issues $230 million verdict against U.S. for Sutherland Springs shooting

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Federal judge issues $230 million verdict against U.S. for Sutherland Springs shooting

Federal Court
General court 07

shutterstock.com

SAN  ANTONIO - Federal district court judge Xavier Rodriguez  issued a verdict yesterday against the U.S. in the amount of $230,000,000 for the government’s role in causing the shooting at Sutherland Springs First Baptist Church on Nov. 5, 2017, a press release states.

Twenty-six people perished and twenty-two more were seriously injured in the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history. The verdict will compensate more than 80 family members of victims and survivors who filed suit against the government.  

In  April of 2021, Judge Rodriguez ruled that the Air Force was 60 percent  responsible for the shooting. Rodriguez found that for more than 30 years, the Air Force negligently  and dangerously failed to report thousands of violent felons into the  FBI criminal background check system. That system, the National Instant  Criminal Background Check System (NICS), is designed to prevent  convicted criminals from purchasing or possessing  firearms. One of those felons illegally purchased an assault rifle with  multiple high-capacity magazines and used to commit the shooting at  Sutherland Springs First Baptist Church.

In  a 185-page opinion, Judge Rodriguez individually evaluated each of the  victims’ losses and rendered a verdict that family legal representatives  agree falls within settled  law in Texas state and federal courts for similar instances of grievous  loss. 

He explained: “The  losses and pain these families have experienced is immeasurable. Our  civil justice system only allows us to rectify these kinds of losses  through money damages. Valuing  human life, pain, and suffering is a task that our justice system has  imposed on judges and juries, and the methodology used by both has been  varied…. Ultimately, there is no satisfying way to determine the worth  of these families’ pain.”

The Court rejected the Government’s approach to limiting the victim’s recovery: “Its  effort to obfuscate its responsibility by attempting to import a  no-fault damages model into a case in which the Court has already found  liability is wholly unavailing.”

Lead  trial counsel, Jamal Alsaffar, responded to the verdict with this  statement: “These families are the heroes here. While no amount can  bring back the many lives lost or destroyed  at the hands of the Government’s negligence, their bravery in obtaining  this verdict will make this country safer by helping ensure that this  type of governmental failure does not happen in our country again.”

Lead  Counsel for the Plaintiffs is Jamal Alsaffar and Tom Jacob of  Whitehurst, Harkness, Brees, Cheng, Alsaffar, Higginbotham & Jacob  PLLC, The plaintiffs are also represented  by April Strahan of The Ammons Law Firm, Daniel Barks of Speiser Krause  PC, Jason Steed of Kilpatrick Townsend Stockton LLP, Justin Dem-erath  of O'Hanlon, Demerath & Castillo, Bob Hilliard & Marion Reilly  of Hilliard Munoz Gonzales LLP, Hugh Plummer of the  Law Offices of Thomas J. Henry, Den-nis Peery and R. Craig Bettis of  Tyler & Peery, Kelly W. Kelly of Anderson & Asso-ciates Law  Firm, Brett Reynolds of Brett Reynolds & Associates PC, Frank  Herrera Jr. and Jorge A. Herrera of The Herrera Law Firm, Jason Webster  of The Webster Law Firm, Erik Knockaert & Joe Schreiber of  Schreiber Knockaert PLLC, Tim Maloney and Paul Campolo of Maloney &  Campolo LLP, Daniel Sciano of Tinsman & Sciano, George LeGrand and  Stanley Bernstein of LeGrand and Bernstein, and Craig W. Carlson  and Phillip J. Koelsch of The Carlson Law Firm P.C. 

More News