The following cases categorized as "contract - consumer/commercial/debt" were on the docket in the Harris County Civil Court on Nov. 10. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "contract - consumer/commercial/debt" were on the docket in the Harris County Civil Court on Nov. 9. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The Harris County Civil Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by Reliant Energy Retail Services LLC against Chresaaun Morrow on Nov. 9.
The Harris County Civil Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Reliant Energy Retail Services LLC against Chresaaun Morrow on Nov. 10: 'Original Petition Citation Cmcc Rrr Issued'.
The following cases categorized as "contract - consumer/commercial/debt" were on the docket in the Harris County Civil Court on May 6. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "contract - consumer/commercial/debt" were on the docket in the Harris County Civil Court on May 5. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "contract - consumer/commercial/debt" were on the docket in the Harris County Civil Court on May 3. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The Harris County Civil Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by American Express National Bank against William Morrow on May 6: 'Original Petition Citation Issued'.
The Harris County Civil Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Capital One Bank USA N.A. against Patrice D. Morrow on May 5: 'Original Petition Citation Issued'.
Exactly a month ago, a jury in the Western District of North Carolina returned a verdict in favor of Nexus Technologies, et al, in what could prove to be an intellectual property case with historical importance.
Exactly a month ago, a jury in the Western District of North Carolina returned a verdict in favor of Nexus Technologies, et al, in what could prove to be an intellectual property case with historical importance.
