Raytheon Company v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al 2:15-cv-00341-JRG-RSP
Raytheon Company v. Sony Kabushiki Kaisha et al 2:15-cv-00342-JRG-RSP
Plaintiff is a Plano company.
Raytheon seeks a judgment of infringement by Defendants of U.S. Patent No. 5,591,678 (the “’678 Patent”) entitled “Process of Manufacturing a
Microelectric Device using a Removable Support Substrate and Etch-Stop.”
Longview attorney William Davis III represents the plaintiff.
Saint Lawrence Communications v. ZTE Corporation et al 2:15-cv-00349-JRG
Saint Lawrence Communications LLC v. Sony Mobile Communications 2:15-cv-00350-JRG
Saint Lawrence Communications LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC 2:15-cv-00351-JRG
Plaintiff is a Plano company.
On Sept. 21, 2004, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 6,795,805 (“the ’805 Patent”), entitled
“Periodicity Enhancement in Decoding Wideband Signals.” St. Lawrence holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’805 Patent.
The plaintiff also claims infringement of the 7.260,521 and 7,191,123 patents
The suit accuses the defendants of using the tech in their HD voice products.
The plaintiff is represented by Demetrios Anaipakos, attorney for the Houston law firm Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing.
Eclipse IP LLC v. Alfa Vitamin Laboratories, Inc. 2:15-cv-00353
Eclipse IP LLC v. American Fitness Wholesalers, LLC 2:15-cv-00354
Eclipse IP LLC v. Dick Blick Holdings, Inc. 2:15-cv-00355
Eclipse IP LLC v. eSupplements LLC 2:15-cv-00356
Eclipse IP LLC v. Fred Perry USA, Inc. 2:15-cv-00357
Eclipse IP LLC v. Hammer Nutrition, Ltd 2:15-cv-00358
The plaintiff is a Florida company.
On Jan. 15, 2008, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office duly and lawfully issued
United States Patent No. 7,319,414 (the “‘414 patent”), entitled “Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia.”
On information and belief, defendants have directly infringe by selling computer-based notification systems and methods to, for example monitor travel data in connection with orders placed via defendants’ website.
Plano attorney Craig Tadlock represents the plaintiff.
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. 6:15-cv-00170-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Build.com Inc. 6:15-cv-00171-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. CafePress Inc. 6:15-cv-00172-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. CDW Corporation 6:15-cv-00174-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Art.com Inc. 6:15-cv-00175-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Colony Brands, Inc. 6:15-cv-00177-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Beachbody, LLC 6:15-cv-00178-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Disney Store USA, LLC 6:15-cv-00179-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Edible Arrangements, LLC 6:15-cv-00180-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. The Gap Inc. 6:15-cv-00181-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Brown Shoe Company, Inc. 6:15-cv-00182-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Hayneedle Inc. 6:15-cv-00183-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Karmaloop, Inc. 6:15-cv-00184-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. 6:15-cv-00185-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc. 6:15-cv-00186-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. 6:15-cv-00187-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. W.W. Grainger Inc. 6:15-cv-00188-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. eBags, Inc. 6:15-cv-00189-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. GameFly Inc. 6:15-cv-00190-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Nasty Gal Inc. 6:15-cv-00191-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. OmahaSteaks.com, Inc. 6:15-cv-00192-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Zazzle Inc. 6:15-cv-00193-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. 6:15-cv-00194-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. JP Boden Services Inc. et al 6:15-cv-00195-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Gander Direct Marketing Services, LLC 6:15-cv-00196-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 6:15-cv-00198-RWS-KNM
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Ellison Systems, Inc. d/b/a Shoplet.com 6:15-cv-00199-RWS-KNM
Plaintiff is a Tyler company.
Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the 7,356,606 Patent entitled “Dynamic Web
The patent involves tech used in conducting commerce over the Internet.
Longview attorney Todd Brandt represents the plaintiff.