Recent patent infringement cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas

By David Yates | May 4, 2015


April 24

eDekka LLC v., Inc. 2:15-cv-00541-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Destination Maternity Corporation 2:15-cv-00542-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Action Envelop & Printing Co., Inc. 2:15-cv-00543-JRG

eDekka LLC v. DA Wuster Inc. d/b/a 2:15-cv-00544-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Cymax Stores USA, LLC 2:15-cv-00545-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. 2:15-cv-00546-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Columbia Sportswear Company 2:15-cv-00547-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Cole Haan LLC 2:15-cv-00548-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Claire's Stores, Inc. 2:15-cv-00549-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Boot Barn, Inc. 2:15-cv-00550-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Birchbox, Inc. 2:15-cv-00551-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Bebe Studio, Inc. 2:15-cv-00553-JRG

eDekka LLC v. ALDO U.S., Inc. 2:15-cv-00554-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Balsam Hill LLC 2:15-cv-00555-JRG

eDekka LLC v. AM Retail Group, Inc. 2:15-cv-00556-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Arlington Contact Lens Service 2:15-cv-00557-JRG

eDekka LLC v., Inc.            2:15-cv-00558-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Asics America Corporation 2:15-cv-00559-JRG

eDekka LLC v. Aveda Corporation 2:15-cv-00560-JRG

eDekka LLC v. ATMAN 2:15-cv-00561-JRG

Plaintiff is a Plano company.

The patent infringement actions seek to stop Defendants’ infringement of United

States Patent No. 6,266,674 (“the ‘674 patent”) entitled “Random Access Information Retrieval Utilizing User-Defined Labels.”

Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief.

Dallas attorney Austin Hansley represents the plaintiff.


April 29

Voxathon LLC v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc. 2:15-cv-00562-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. American Honda Motor 2:15-cv-00563-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. FCA US LLC 2:15-cv-00564-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Ford Motor Company 2:15-cv-00565-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. General Motors Company 2:15-cv-00566-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Hyundai Motor America 2:15-cv-00567-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Jaguar Land Rover North America 2:15-cv-00568-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc. 2:15-cv-00569-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Pioneer Electronics 2:15-cv-00570-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Subaru of America, Inc. 2:15-cv-00571-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Toyota Motor Sales 2:15-cv-00572-JRG

Voxathon LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 2:15-cv-00573-JRG

Plaintiff is a Plano company.

On Aug. 27, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,442,261 (“the ‘261 Patent”) was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The ‘261 Patent is titled “Call Recovery Method and Apparatus for an Attendant Telephone Set.”

Voxathon is the assignee of all right, title and interest in the ‘261 patent, including all rights to enforce and prosecute actions for infringement and to collect damages for all relevant times against infringers of the ‘261 Patent.

The plaintiff is represented by David Bennett, a Chicago attorney.


April 30

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al 2:15-cv-00576

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Sprint 2:15-cv-00579

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. T-Mobile USA 2:15-cv-00580

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Verizon 2:15-cv-00581

Plaintiff is a Plano company.

Plaintiff claims infringement of the following patents:

- 8,457,022, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Signaling of Redundancy Versions;”

- 8,570,957, entitled “Extension of Power Headroom Reporting and Trigger Conditions;” and

- 8,867,472, entitled “Signaling of Channel Information.”

Texas attorney Jeffrey Bragalone represents the plaintiff.

More News

The Record Network