Quantcast

Port Arthur Steam Energy case up on appeal, set for submission on briefs in mid November

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Port Arthur Steam Energy case up on appeal, set for submission on briefs in mid November

General court 03

shutterstock.com

BEAUMONT - In September, a district court ruled in favor of Port Arthur Steam Energy against Oxbow Calcining, issuing a post-judgment turnover order mandating that Oxbow deliver flue gas energy generated by the operation of its calciner facility to PASE. 

The 172nd District Court’s order was entered to allow PASE to satisfy its multi-million dollar judgment it obtained against Oxbow in 2015.

Court records show a notice of appeal was filed Sept. 14 by Oxbow. The case is set for submission on briefs on Nov. 19. As of Oct. 25, no briefs are yet on file.

PASE operates a steam generation plant. Oxbow is under contract to supply flue gas energy to PASE. In turn, PASE uses the flue gas to operate boilers that generate steam. PASE sells and delivers the steam to a nearby plant, Valero Port Arthur Refinery.

Over the course of three days, Judge Donald Floyd heard evidence presented by PASE and Oxbow in the post-judgment proceedings. Oxbow’s counsel argued certain environmental concerns involving sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions present in the flue gas prevented Oxbow from delivering the flue heat they were otherwise contractually obligated to provide to PASE.

In a 12-page order, the court ruled in favor of PASE finding “clear and convincing evidence” warranting the full post-judgment relief sought.

The court’s order stated: “If Oxbow has or believes that it has an actual or potential pollution problem, Oxbow is required under the Judgment and Arbitration Award to address the problem. That has already been judicially determined.  Shutting off the delivery of waste heat to PASE’s boilers and keeping PASE from operating, selling steam, and generating heat payments that may be offset to collect its judgment are not actions consistent with the terms of the Arbitration Award and Judgment, particularly when Oxbow continues to operate all of its kilns.”

The court’s ruling further stated: “… this Court is troubled that Oxbow’s avoidance of satisfaction of the judgment is being justified as necessary for Oxbow to avoid detection of the SO2 pollution levels at the TCEQ monitor while Oxbow simply discharges the same pollution to another location.”

In 2011, PASE won an arbitration ruling against Oxbow wherein the panel determined that Oxbow “fostered a culture that repeatedly interrupted or reduced delivery of maximum flue gas energy to PASE” via the dedicated kilns. The arbitration panel ruled PASE could recover the $3.4 million in damages through heat payments from future operations of the steam plant.

Following an appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, the arbitration award was confirmed in a 2015 judgment. After the judgment was entered, Oxbow reduced and ultimately stopped its delivery of flue gas to PASE from its three dedicated kilns. This kept PASE from collecting on its judgment and forced them out of operation. At the same time, Oxbow continued to operate all of its kilns, bypassing PASE and discharging all flue gas directly into the atmosphere through its own hot stacks.

PASE is represented by Loyd Neal & Jim Dunn of Dunn & Neal LLP in Houston along with Jones of Harrison Davis Steakley Morrison Jones (Beaumont and Waco).

Oxbow is represented by Michael S Goldberg & Kevin T Jacobs of Baker Botts LLP (Houston) along with Guy N Goodson & Toby F Nash of Germer PLLC (Beaumont).

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News