TYLER DIVISION
Aug. 17
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd. 6:15-cv-00781-JRG-KNM
IDQ is the plaintiff.
It complains of purported infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,260,943 (the ‘943 patent) entitled “Apparatus and Method for Servicing a Coolant System”.
The ‘943 patent was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 28, 2007.
IDQ seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorney Allen Franklin Gardner of the law firm Potter Minton in Tyler.
MARSHALL DIVISION
Aug. 19
uLogin LLC v. Booking.com (USA) Inc 2:15-cv-01417-JRG-RSP
uLogin LLC v. The Gap Inc 2:15-cv-01418-JRG-RSP
uLogin LLC v. LivingSocial Inc 2:15-cv-01419-JRG-RSP
uLogin LLC v. Nordstrom Inc 2:15-cv-01420-JRG-RSP
Plaintiff uLogin is based in Plano.
It alleges infringement in relation to United States Patent No. 5,712,979 (the '979 patent), entitled “Method And Apparatus For Attaching Navigational History Information To Universal Resource Locator Links On A World Wide Web Page”.
The ‘979 patent was issued by the USPTO on June 27, 1998.
The technology recited in the claims of the '979 patent does not claim an abstract idea and provides an inventive concept, according to uLogin’s complaint.
Consequently, the plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorneys Richard C. Weinblatt and Andrew W. Spangler.
Aug. 21
Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Celgene Corporation 2:15-cv-01426
Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. General Electric Company 2:15-cv-01427
Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation 2:15-cv-01428
Plaintiff Marshall is based in Marshall.
The company has initiated legal action in response to alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,886,750 (the ‘750 patent) and 8,910,876 (the ‘876 patent), both of which are entitled “Method and Apparatus for Accessing Electronic Data via a Familiar Printed Medium”.
The inventors Spencer A. Rathus, Lois Fichner-Rathus and Jeffrey S. Nevid have been operating Marshall in Texas since 2004.
The complainant seeks unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial.
It is represented by attorney Austin Hansley of the law firm Austin Hansley PLLC in Dallas.