SOUTH PADRE ISLAND – Limiting the number of food trucks in South Padre Island and requiring them to be green lighted by local restaurants “is reasonable and protects public health,” according to a recently filed appellate brief.
South Padre Island banned mobile food vendors from serving crowds of hungry beachgoers until 2016. When the city finally allowed food truck entrepreneurs in, local restaurant owners complained. In response, the city council rewrote the ordinance and added two provisions.
The provisions capped the number of food truck permits at 12 and required applicants to obtain the signature of a local restaurant owner.
Representing food truck vendors, the Institute for Justice sued the city, arguing the restrictions are unconstitutional and anticompetitive.
In late November, a district court struck down the city’s permit cap and what the institute calls a “restaurant permission scheme” allowing local eatery owners to act as gatekeepers to food truck permits.
On Dec. 14, the city, which continues to enforce the restrictions, appealed. Two months later, the city filed its brief on Feb. 12, arguing that the city’s code is “reasonable and protects public health.”
“The permit cap was reasonable,” the brief states. “In small or rural cities, resources get stretched which presents substantial public health risks. Some regulation is needed to control the risk, which be done via zoning or capping permits. By not capping permits, the City could be creating a public health risk when resources get stretched thin.”
The city is represented by attorneys Roger Hughes, Adams & Graham, and Arnold Aguilar, Aguilar & Zabarte.
Institute for Justice attorneys Arif Panju and Keith Diggs represent the food truck vendors.
Appeals case No. 13-20-00536-CV