Quantcast

Ohio judge limits husband's subpoena in guardianship racketeering lawsuit

SOUTHEAST TEXAS RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Ohio judge limits husband's subpoena in guardianship racketeering lawsuit

General court 01

shutterstock.com

OHIO - The Honorable Civil Judge Sherrie Miday granted a probate  court officer’s motion for a protective order against a subpoena in a  lawsuit filed by a retired surgeon alleging racketeering in the  guardianship of his 85 year old wife who is currently a ward of the  state.

Cuyahoga  County Civil Judge Miday’s protective order was issued in response to  Defendant Zachary B. Simonoff’s request to conceal the release of bank  records from outside parties. The bank records relate to the financial activities of Mrs. Fourough Bakhtiar [Saghafi]’s guardianship, according to a press release.

“The  court hereby issues an order requiring that any filing in this case  attaching or referencing the ward’s confidential information, including  but not limited to any financial institution records, be filed under  seal,” wrote the Honorable Judge Miday in her Dec. 31 order.

As  previously reported, Dr. Mehdi Saghafi, 89, sued a construction  company, 8 lawyers, a CPA and Simonoff a year ago after he was allegedly  forced to divorce his wife Fourough Bakhtiar [Saghafi], resulting in  the division of some $8 million in marital assets.

Court  records show that on Nov. 21, 2019, Judge Miday ordered Defendant  Simonoff to produce insurance documents that could provide coverage for  the claims asserted by Plaintiff Dr. Saghafi. That's because in  most states, guardians of the estate or adult person under court  appointed guardianship due to cognitive decline, incompetency or  physical disability are required to be bonded or insured in the event  there are claims, such as the lawsuit that Dr. Saghafi initiated last  year. 

Dr.  Saghafi had been married to Mrs. Saghafi for sixty years until she was  placed under court appointed guardianship by the Honorable Lorain County  Probate Judge James Walther in 2013. The former couple share five  children and ten grandchildren. It was the Honorable Lorain County  Probate Judge Walther who appointed Defendant Simonoff as guardian of  Mrs. Bakhtiar [Saghafi]’s estate.

However,  Dr. Saghafi alleges spending within his wife’s guardianship has been  frivolous and unnecessary and that prior court judgments were obtained  from the Honorable Lorain County Probate Judge Walther improperly and  without jurisdiction.

According  to court records, the Honorable Lorain County Probate Judge Walther was  served a subpoena duces tecum requiring him to arrive to Cuyahoga  County Civil Court of Common Pleas on Sept. 16, 2019 with relevant  documents.  Duties of the Lorain County Probate Court Clerk are fulfilled by the Honorable Judge Walther himself and when  he missed the deadline, Dr. Saghafi’s attorney Chuck Longo filed a  Motion to Show Cause as to why the Honorable Judge Walther should not be  held in contempt.

“This  Court has inherent and rule based authority to hold Judge Walther, and  by extension the Lorain County Probate Court, in contempt for their  failure to comply with the Subpoena; equally, this Court has the  authority to order Judge Walther to show cause [as to] why he should not  be in contempt for the compliance failure,” stated Longo in Saghafi's  pleading.

The  Honorable Judge Walther’s request to extend time to answer the Motion  to Show Cause as to why he should not be held in contempt for failure to  respond to Dr. Saghafi’s subpoena was granted by the Honorable Judge  Miday, also on Dec. 31. 

“Lorain  County Probate Court Judge James T. Walther is to respond to  plaintiff’s Motion to Show Cause why the Lorain County Probate Clerk  should not be held in contempt for failure to respond to subpoena [filed  on Nov. 21, 2019] on or before Jan. 3, 2020,” states Honorable Judge  Miday’s order.

The deadline for discovery in the litigation was extended until May 1, 2020.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

Town of HowePaJamesCpHiB.OhiCpa

More News